Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 6 |
| Higher Education | 4 |
| Scores | 4 |
| Achievement Tests | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Equated Scores | 3 |
| Test Format | 3 |
| Adaptive Testing | 2 |
| Comparative Testing | 2 |
| Item Analysis | 2 |
| Latent Trait Theory | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Anderson, Paul S. | 1 |
| Frick, Theodore W. | 1 |
| Kanzler, Eileen M. | 1 |
| Nering, Michael L., Ed. | 1 |
| Noonan, John V. | 1 |
| Olsen, James B. | 1 |
| Ostini, Remo, Ed. | 1 |
| Sarvela, Paul D. | 1 |
| Sorensen, H. Barbara | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
| Books | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 6 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Students | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkNering, Michael L., Ed.; Ostini, Remo, Ed. – Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2010
This comprehensive "Handbook" focuses on the most used polytomous item response theory (IRT) models. These models help us understand the interaction between examinees and test questions where the questions have various response categories. The book reviews all of the major models and includes discussions about how and where the models…
Descriptors: Guides, Item Response Theory, Test Items, Correlation
Olsen, James B.; And Others – 1986
Student achievement test scores were compared and equated, using three different testing methods: paper-administered, computer-administered, and computerized adaptive testing. The tests were developed from third and sixth grade mathematics item banks of the California Assessment Program. The paper and the computer-administered tests were identical…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Download full textSarvela, Paul D.; Noonan, John V. – 1987
Although there are many advantages to using computer-based tests (CBTs) linked to computer-based instruction (CBI), there are also several difficulties. In certain instructional settings, it is difficult to conduct psychometric analyses of test results. Several measurement issues surface when CBT programs are linked to CBI. Testing guidelines…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Assisted Testing, Educational Testing, Equated Scores
Sorensen, H. Barbara – AEDS Monitor, 1985
This study validated computerized versions of selected tests from the Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests of 1976, compared performance of higher education students on computerized and paper-and-pencil versions of the tests, and explored whether gender, academic status, or age interacted with the tests. (MBR)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Tests, Comparative Analysis
Anderson, Paul S.; Kanzler, Eileen M. – 1985
Test scores were compared for two types of objective achievement tests--multiple choice tests and the recently developed Multi-Digit Test (MDT) procedure. MDT is an approximation of the fill-in-the-blank technique. Students select their answers from long lists of alphabetized terms, with each answer corresponding to a number from 001 to 999. The…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cloze Procedure, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Frick, Theodore W. – 1986
The sequential probability ratio test (SPRT), developed by Abraham Wald, is one statistical model available for making mastery decisions during computer-based criterion referenced tests. The predictive validity of the SPRT was empirically investigated with two different and relatively large item pools with heterogeneous item parameters. Graduate…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Adaptive Testing, Classification, Comparative Analysis
