Descriptor
Error Patterns | 4 |
Performance Factors | 4 |
Adults | 1 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Arithmetic | 1 |
Blindness | 1 |
Braille | 1 |
Case Studies | 1 |
Classroom Environment | 1 |
College Faculty | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 4 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Nigeria | 1 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Newman, Slater E.; And Others – International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 1990
This study evaluated performance of blind (n=17) and sighted adults on a haptic numerosity task of braille symbols in which symbol size was varied. Although blind subjects performed better than seeing subjects, the rate of learning and patterns of errors were similar, except that blind subjects did better with standard than with enlarged symbols.…
Descriptors: Adults, Blindness, Braille, Error Patterns

Gzesh, Steven M.; Surber, Colleen F. – Child Development, 1985
Evaluated the effects of stimulus complexity and rule usage on a visual perspective-taking task administered to preschoolers, first, third, and fifth graders, and adults. Errors decreased with age, and more errors occurred with the more complex visual arrays. Very young children could not reliably match a photograph to a physical array. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Elementary School Students, Error Patterns, Labeling (of Persons)

Oshagbemi, Titus – Educational Studies, 1996
Employs a multiple research methodology to investigate and compare the time perceptions of university teachers from the United Kingdom and Nigeria. Both groups seriously miscalculated time spent on various activities. Reveals remarkable similarities regarding the actual activities and the degrees of estimation. (MJP)
Descriptors: Classroom Environment, College Faculty, Educational Practices, Error Patterns

Hativa, Nira – Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1988
A student was observed practicing arithmetic with a computer-assisted instruction (CAI) system. She enjoyed practice and believed that it helped. However, she consistently failed to solve problems on the computer that she could do with pencil and paper. This paper suggests reasons for her problems and draws implications for CAI. (Author/PK)
Descriptors: Arithmetic, Case Studies, Computation, Computer Assisted Instruction