NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kekale, Tauno; de Weerd-Nederhof, Petra; Cervai, Sara; Borelli, Massimo – Journal of Workplace Learning, 2009
Purpose: During work as reviewers and editors of journals authors are often faced the same types of problems in many articles. The purpose of this piece is to give some guidelines on typical problems that lead to rejection, and how to avoid these. Design/methodology/approach: The paper discusses journal article design and offers some methodology…
Descriptors: Guidelines, Journal Articles, Research Methodology, Editing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Crescentini, Alberto; Mainardi, Giuditta – Journal of Workplace Learning, 2009
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to give ideas and suggestions to avoid some typical problems of qualitative articles. The aim is not to debate quality in qualitative research but to indicate some practical solutions. Design/methodology/approach: The paper discusses the design of qualitative research and the structure of a qualitative article…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Guidelines, Writing for Publication, Editing
Sadler, D. Royce – 1984
Guidelines concerning publishing in scholarly journals, with emphasis on internationally known journals, are provided. Much of the information applies to the social sciences and education and, to a lesser extent, to the humanities. An overview of the workings of the publication enterprise is included for the new author, along with a list of 10…
Descriptors: Authors, Editing, Guidelines, Higher Education
Gray, Peter J. – 1984
Designed to provide guidance in selecting the appropriate microcomputer-based word processing program, this document discusses the key characteristics of word processing software, including formatting, editing, merging, and printing. Possible capabilities of word processing features are identified, i.e., indent, tab, center, creation of footnotes,…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Editing, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods