Descriptor
Author
Beal, Loretta F. | 1 |
Gwinn, John F. | 1 |
Jelden, D. L. | 1 |
Johnson, Marilyn F. | 1 |
Jonassen, David H. | 1 |
Moe, Kim C. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 4 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 4 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Differential Aptitude Test | 1 |
Hidden Figures Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Moe, Kim C.; Johnson, Marilyn F. – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1988
Describes study of 315 secondary school students that investigated their reactions to computerized testing and assessed the practicability of this testing method in the classroom. Two versions of a standardized aptitude test battery used are described, one computerized and one printed, and a survey assessing students' reactions is discussed. (9…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Analysis of Variance, Aptitude Tests, Computer Assisted Testing

Gwinn, John F.; Beal, Loretta F. – Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 1988
Describes an interactive computer-testing and record-keeping system that was implemented for a self-paced anatomy and physiology course. Results of exploratory research are reported that focus on student preference for online testing, test anxiety, attitude, and achievement; and suggestions are given for integrating a computer-testing program into…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Anatomy, Computer Assisted Testing, Database Management Systems
Jonassen, David H. – 1986
The purpose of this study was to adapt the Hidden Figures Test (a measure of field dependence/independence) to microcomputer display and to assess its alternate form reliability when compared to a paper and pencil test. Participants included 58 undergraduate and graduate students (91.4% female) at a southeastern university who were fairly normal…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Style

Jelden, D. L. – Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 1988
Reviews study conducted to compare levels of achievement on final exams for college students responding to combinations of test-item feedback methods and modes of test-item presentation. The PHOENIX computer system used in the comparison is described, and the use of ACT (American College Testing Program) scores for ability comparison is discussed.…
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Analysis of Covariance