NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sandra Jo Wilson; Brian Freeman; E. C. Hedberg – Grantee Submission, 2024
As reporting of effect sizes in evaluation studies has proliferated, researchers and consumers of research need tools for interpreting or benchmarking the magnitude of those effect sizes that are relevant to the intervention, target population, and outcome measure being considered. Similarly, researchers planning education studies with social and…
Descriptors: Benchmarking, Effect Size, Meta Analysis, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rosenthal, David A.; Hoyt, William T.; Ferrin, James M.; Miller, Susan; Cohen, Nicholas D. – Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 2006
Over the past 25 years, meta-analysis has assumed a significant role in the synthesis of counseling and psychotherapy research through the evaluation and interpretation of the results of multiple studies. An examination of four widely recognized rehabilitation counseling journals, however, reveals that only one meta-analysis (Bolton & Akridge,…
Descriptors: Psychotherapy, Rehabilitation Counseling, Data Interpretation, Meta Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kavale, Kenneth A. – Exceptionality, 2001
Discussion of the methods of meta-analysis first identifies problems associated with research integration, the limitations of traditional review techniques, and the advantages of quantitative methods. Meta-analytic procedures are described with respect to how they parallel classical scientific method, including problem formulation, sampling,…
Descriptors: Data Interpretation, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Meta Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Strain, Phillip S.; Dunst, Carl J. – Exceptional Children, 1986
In the context of a discussion of the use of meta-analysis techniques, two articles take issue with the findings of Casto and Mastropieri concerning effects of early intervention, in particular age-at-start parent involvement, conceptual and methodological problems. The authors of the original article provide rebuttals to the critiques. (JW)
Descriptors: Data Interpretation, Disabilities, Early Childhood Education, Exceptional Child Research