NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)1
Descriptor
Audits (Verification)1
Evaluation Criteria1
Evaluation Needs1
Evaluation Problems1
Evaluation Research1
Feedback (Response)1
Grants1
Investigations1
Performance Factors1
Program Descriptions1
Program Design1
Program Evaluation1
Research Administration1
More ▼
Source
Research Management Review1
Author
Miner, Jeremy T.1
Publication Type
Journal Articles1
Reports - Descriptive1
Education Level
Higher Education1
Audience
Researchers1
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing one result Save | Export
Behind Door #3: The Hard-to-Please Grant Reviewer
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Miner, Jeremy T. – Research Management Review, 2011
After months of waiting, the grant reviews came back: "excellent," "excellent," and "fair." What?! How can this be? Why is the third review so out of line with the first two? On more than one occasion a principal investigator (PI) has been frustrated not only by a negative funding decision but more so by the accompanying reviewer evaluation forms…
Descriptors: Research Administration, Grants, Feedback (Response), Evaluation Criteria