Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Program Implementation | 4 |
| State Aid | 4 |
| Counties | 2 |
| Crime Prevention | 2 |
| Educational Trends | 2 |
| Gender Differences | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Intervention | 2 |
| Juvenile Justice | 2 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| Program Evaluation | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 4 |
| Researchers | 4 |
| Administrators | 2 |
| Policymakers | 2 |
Location
| California | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Fain, Terry; Turner, Susan; Ridgeway, Greg – RAND Corporation, 2010
In 2000, the California State Legislature passed the Schiff-Cardenas Crime Prevention Act, which authorized funding for county juvenile-justice programs and designated the Corrections Standards Authority (CSA) (formerly named the Board of Corrections) the administrator of funding. A 2001 California Senate bill extended the funding and changed the…
Descriptors: Intervention, Crime Prevention, Program Evaluation, Program Effectiveness
Turner, Susan; Fain, Terry; Sehgal, Amber – RAND Corporation, 2007
In 2000, the California State Legislature passed the Schiff-Cardenas Crime Prevention Act, which authorized funding for county juvenile justice programs and designated the Corrections Standards Authority (CSA), formerly named the Board of Corrections, the administrator of funding. California counties receiving state funds for Juvenile Justice…
Descriptors: Program Implementation, Intervention, Crime, Crime Prevention
Peer reviewedBurke, Joseph C. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1998
Performance funding for public colleges is attractive to state policymakers but volatile and difficult to implement. It requires levels of collaboration, cooperation, patience, and persistence unusual in state government and a commitment to institutional goals, performance standards, and coordinated activities rare in academic governance. However,…
Descriptors: Educational Trends, Government School Relationship, Higher Education, Institutional Cooperation
Peer reviewedSerban, Andreea M. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1998
Although selecting goals and indicators is the most challenging task of performance funding, implementation requires development of other critical elements: success criteria to measure institutional performance; indicator weights for percent of funding allocated to each indicator; an allocation method for setting the relationship between…
Descriptors: Educational Trends, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education

Direct link
