Descriptor
| Comparative Testing | 2 |
| Science Tests | 2 |
| Test Format | 2 |
| Chemistry | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Intelligence Differences | 1 |
| Objective Tests | 1 |
| Problem Solving | 1 |
| Response Style (Tests) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Alberta Journal of… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 2 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedAllison, Donald E. – Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1984
Reports that no significant difference in reliability appeared between a heterogeneous and a homogeneous form of the same general science matching-item test administered to 316 sixth-grade students but that scores on the heterogeneous form of the test were higher, independent of the examinee's sex or intelligence. (SB)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Comparative Testing, Elementary Education, Grade 6
Shavelson, Richard J.; And Others – 1988
This study investigated the relationships among the symbolic representation of problems given to students to solve, the mental representations they use to solve the problems, and the accuracy of their solutions. Twenty eleventh-grade science students were asked to think aloud as they solved problems on the ideal gas laws. The problems were…
Descriptors: Chemistry, Comparative Testing, Problem Solving, Response Style (Tests)
