NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Geiser, Christian; Eid, Michael; Nussbeck, Fridtjof W. – Psychological Methods, 2008
In a recent article, A. Maydeu-Olivares and D. L. Coffman (2006, see EJ751121) presented a random intercept factor approach for modeling idiosyncratic response styles in questionnaire data and compared this approach with competing confirmatory factor analysis models. Among the competing models was the CT-C(M-1) model (M. Eid, 2000). In an…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Questionnaires
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hayashi, Kentaro; Bentler, Peter M.; Yuan, Ke-Hai – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2007
In the exploratory factor analysis, when the number of factors exceeds the true number of factors, the likelihood ratio test statistic no longer follows the chi-square distribution due to a problem of rank deficiency and nonidentifiability of model parameters. As a result, decisions regarding the number of factors may be incorrect. Several…
Descriptors: Researchers, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yoon, Myeongsun; Millsap, Roger E. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2007
In testing factorial invariance, researchers have often used a reference variable strategy in which the factor loading for a variable (i.e., reference variable) is fixed to 1 for identification. This commonly used method can be misleading if the chosen reference variable is actually a noninvariant item. This simulation study suggests an…
Descriptors: Item Analysis, Testing, Monte Carlo Methods, Structural Equation Models