Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Author
Adelman, Cliff | 1 |
Attard, Angele | 1 |
Bergan, Gabriela | 1 |
Bergan, Sjur | 1 |
Conrad, Clifton F. | 1 |
Di Iorio, Emma | 1 |
Ewell, Peter | 1 |
Gaston, Paul | 1 |
Geven, Koen | 1 |
Haworth, Jennifer Grant | 1 |
Ivanova, Lillya | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Guides - Non-Classroom | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Books | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 6 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Two Year Colleges | 2 |
Audience
Students | 7 |
Administrators | 4 |
Policymakers | 3 |
Teachers | 3 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Researchers | 1 |
Location
California | 2 |
United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Chief Justice Earl Warren Institute on Law and Social Policy, 2015
"Degrees of Freedom" challenges California to include currently and formerly incarcerated students in the vision set by the state's 1964 Master Plan for Higher Education--a vision of college access for all, for the benefit of the entire state. A college education strengthens economies, changes lives and renews communities, and yet, for…
Descriptors: Access to Education, Correctional Education, Institutionalized Persons, Correctional Institutions
Mukamal, Debbie; Silbert, Rebecca; Taylor, Rebecca M. – Chief Justice Earl Warren Institute on Law and Social Policy, 2015
"Degrees of Freedom" finds that California has not been adequately providing effective college opportunities for criminal justice-involved students, despite the fact that such access will help California build safer and more economically viable communities. This report is part of a larger initiative--Renewing Communities--to expand…
Descriptors: Access to Education, Correctional Education, Institutionalized Persons, Correctional Institutions
Lumina Foundation for Education, 2011
With the assistance of four writers and dozens of expert reviewers, Lumina Foundation for Education offers the first step in creating a Degree Qualifications Profile for American higher education. The Degree Profile is a baseline set of reference points for what students should do to earn associate, bachelor's and master's degrees--regardless of…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Prior Learning, Profiles, Qualifications
Adelman, Cliff; Ewell, Peter; Gaston, Paul; Schneider, Carol Geary – Lumina Foundation for Education, 2011
Through this document, Lumina Foundation for Education offers a "Degree Qualifications Profile," a tool that can help transform U.S. higher education. A Degree Profile--or qualifications framework--illustrates clearly what students should be expected to know and be able to do once they earn their degrees--at any level. This Degree…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Profiles, Qualifications, Academic Degrees
Ufert, Karina; Pall, Allan; Oye, Olav; Ness, Julie; Bergan, Sjur; Klemencic, Manja; Ivanova, Lillya; Bergan, Gabriela – European Students' Union (NJ1), 2011
"No student left out" should be the motto of the entire student movement. It can be understood in many different ways. No student should indeed be left out of higher education, both in terms of access and progress towards completion in higher education but also in terms of representation in governance structures at all levels. Leaving no…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Student Participation, Governance, Democracy
Attard, Angele; Di Iorio, Emma; Geven, Koen; Santa, Robert – European Students' Union (NJ1), 2010
This Toolkit forms part of the project entitled "Time for a New Paradigm in Education: Student-Centred Learning" (T4SCL), jointly led by the European Students' Union (ESU) and Education International (EI). This is an EU-funded project under the Lifelong Learning Programme (LLP) administered by the Education, Audiovisual and Culture…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Lifelong Learning, Foreign Countries, Educational Change
Haworth, Jennifer Grant; Conrad, Clifton F. – 1997
This book proposes an "engagement" theory of program quality to evaluate and improve higher education programs at all degree levels. Based on interviews with 781 participants in a national study of Masters degree programs, it focuses on the interactive roles of students, faculty, and administrators in developing high-quality programs…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Classroom Environment, College Outcomes Assessment, Curriculum Evaluation