Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Program Implementation | 2 |
| Public Policy | 2 |
| State Regulation | 2 |
| Welfare Recipients | 2 |
| Welfare Services | 2 |
| Administrator Attitudes | 1 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Change Strategies | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Coping | 1 |
| Disqualification | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| MDRC | 1 |
Author
| Bloom, Dan | 2 |
| Farrell, Mary | 2 |
| Fink, Barbara | 1 |
| Rich, Sarah | 1 |
| Seith, David | 1 |
| Turner, Lesley | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Personal Responsibility and… | 2 |
| Temporary Assistance for… | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textFarrell, Mary; Rich, Sarah; Turner, Lesley; Seith, David; Bloom, Dan – MDRC, 2008
Time limits on benefit receipt became a central feature of federal welfare policy in the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA). Proponents of welfare reform argued that the time limits in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, would send a firm message to recipients that welfare is…
Descriptors: Employment Services, Family Income, Public Housing, Welfare Recipients
Bloom, Dan; Farrell, Mary; Fink, Barbara – 2002
The effect of welfare time limits on families in different states was examined in a comprehensive study that involved the following activities: (1) a survey of state welfare administrators regarding states' time-limit policies and experiences to date; (2) site visits to five states; and (3) a synthesis of research on time limits. The following…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Case Studies, Comparative Analysis, Disqualification
