Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Credibility | 2 |
| Deception | 2 |
| Ethics | 2 |
| Interviews | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Content Analysis | 1 |
| Diagnostic Tests | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Incentives | 1 |
| Prediction | 1 |
| Recall (Psychology) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Cognitive Psychology | 2 |
Author
| Bogaard, Glynis | 2 |
| Colwell, Kevin | 1 |
| Crans, Samantha | 1 |
| Meijer, Ewout | 1 |
| Verschuere, Bruno | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkVerschuere, Bruno; Bogaard, Glynis; Meijer, Ewout – Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2021
The Verifiability Approach predicts that truth tellers will include details that can be verified by the interviewer, whereas liars will refrain from providing such details. A meta-analysis revealed that truth tellers indeed provided more verifiable details (k = 28, d = 0.49, 95% CI [0.25; 0.74], BF[subscript 10] = 93.28), and a higher proportion…
Descriptors: Deception, Ethics, Credibility, Incentives
Bogaard, Glynis; Colwell, Kevin; Crans, Samantha – Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2019
Active interviewing approaches can exploit the verbal differences between truthtellers and liars, thus improving detecting deception. One such method is the Reality Interview (RI) aimed to facilitate recall from truthtellers, while increasing the difficulty for liars. This study investigated whether the RI could improve the diagnostic accuracy of…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Content Analysis, Recall (Psychology), Credibility
