Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
| Grantee Submission | 1 |
Author
| Barbieri, Christina | 1 |
| Begolli, Kreshnik N. | 1 |
| Booth, Julie L. | 1 |
| Chang, Briana | 1 |
| Davenport, Jodi L. | 1 |
| McGinn, Kelly M. | 1 |
| Miller-Cotto, Dana | 1 |
| Young, Laura K. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkBooth, Julie L.; McGinn, Kelly M.; Barbieri, Christina; Begolli, Kreshnik N.; Chang, Briana; Miller-Cotto, Dana; Young, Laura K.; Davenport, Jodi L. – Grantee Submission, 2017
In the present chapter, we review the evidence for several principles that are especially promising for improving mathematics instruction. Using the classification scheme proposed by Koedinger et al. (2013), we begin with principles that focus on improving memory and fluency: scaffolding, distributed practice, and feedback. We then move to worked…
Descriptors: Cognitive Science, Scientific Principles, Mathematics Instruction, Mathematical Concepts
