Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
| Education and Training in… | 2 |
| Education and Training in… | 1 |
| Exceptionality | 1 |
| Journal of Special Education… | 1 |
| Journal of Visual Impairment… | 1 |
Author
| Bouck, Emily C. | 6 |
| Park, Jiyoon | 3 |
| Bassette, Laura | 2 |
| Chamberlain, Courtney | 1 |
| Cwiakala, Katie | 1 |
| Flanagan, Sara M. | 1 |
| Levy, Kennedy | 1 |
| Satsangi, Rajiv | 1 |
| Shurr, Jordan | 1 |
| Szwed, Kathryn | 1 |
| Taber-Doughty, Teresa | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Reports - Research | 5 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Middle Schools | 4 |
| Secondary Education | 3 |
| Junior High Schools | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 2 |
| Indiana Statewide Testing for… | 1 |
| Kaufman Test of Educational… | 1 |
| Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkBouck, Emily C.; Shurr, Jordan; Bassette, Laura; Park, Jiyoon; Whorley, Abbie – Journal of Special Education Technology, 2018
Manipulatives are a common tool in mathematics teaching and learning, including for students with disabilities. The most common manipulatives are concrete manipulatives, yet app-based manipulatives are a viable age-appropriate option for secondary students with disabilities. Through an adapted alternating treatment design with three middle school…
Descriptors: Manipulative Materials, Mathematics Instruction, Teaching Methods, Middle School Students
Bouck, Emily C.; Chamberlain, Courtney; Park, Jiyoon – Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 2017
Manipulatives support students with and without disabilities in mathematics. However, as students age, concrete manipulatives can be limiting and potentially not age appropriate (Satsangi, 2015). An alternative is virtual manipulatives, including app-based manipulatives. This study compared the use of app-based manipulatives to concrete…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Teaching Methods, Mathematics Instruction, Manipulative Materials
Bouck, Emily C.; Park, Jiyoon; Levy, Kennedy; Cwiakala, Katie; Whorley, Abbey – Exceptionality, 2020
In theory, both virtual manipulatives and explicit instruction are viable options to support students with disabilities as they learn mathematics. This study explored the effect of a treatment package--an app-based virtual manipulative (Cuisenaire® Rods) in conjunction with explicit instruction--on students' acquisition and generalization of…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Manipulative Materials, Direct Instruction, Division
Download full textBouck, Emily C.; Weng, Pei-Lin; Satsangi, Rajiv – Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 2016
Introduction: Digital textbooks are increasingly marketed and used, yet little research examines this medium. Within the limited research, even less investigates the role of digital textbooks in mathematics--a challenging content area for many students, but especially for students with visual impairments. Methods: Through a qualitative analysis,…
Descriptors: Secondary School Students, Student Attitudes, Visual Impairments, Algebra
Yakubova, Gulnoza; Bouck, Emily C. – Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 2014
Calculators are widely used in mathematics education, yet limited research examines the effects of calculators for students with mild intellectual disability. An alternating treatments design was used to study the effects of calculator types (i.e., scientific and graphing) on the mathematical performance (i.e., computation and word problems) of…
Descriptors: Mild Mental Retardation, Calculators, Educational Technology, Grade 5
Bouck, Emily C.; Bassette, Laura; Taber-Doughty, Teresa; Flanagan, Sara M.; Szwed, Kathryn – Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 2009
The effectiveness of a pentop computer when teaching multiplication facts to three middle school students with mild intellectual disabilities was examined. A multiple probe design was used to assess the students learning of one and two digit multiplication facts over a 2-3 week intervention period. During the intervention phase, students used a…
Descriptors: Intervention, Mild Mental Retardation, Computer Uses in Education, Multiplication
