Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Models | 2 |
| Natural Language Processing | 2 |
| Readability | 2 |
| Readability Formulas | 2 |
| Reading Comprehension | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computational Linguistics | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Connected Discourse | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Crossley, Scott A. | 2 |
| Dascalu, Mihai | 2 |
| Skalicky, Stephen | 2 |
| Kyle, Kristopher | 1 |
| McNamara, Danielle S. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Dale Chall Readability Formula | 1 |
| Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
| Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCrossley, Scott A.; Skalicky, Stephen; Dascalu, Mihai – Journal of Research in Reading, 2019
Background: Advances in natural language processing (NLP) and computational linguistics have facilitated major improvements on traditional readability formulas that aim at predicting the overall difficulty of a text. Recent studies have identified several types of linguistic features that are theoretically motivated and predictive of human…
Descriptors: Natural Language Processing, Readability, Reading Comprehension, Reading Rate
Crossley, Scott A.; Skalicky, Stephen; Dascalu, Mihai; McNamara, Danielle S.; Kyle, Kristopher – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2017
Research has identified a number of linguistic features that influence the reading comprehension of young readers; yet, less is known about whether and how these findings extend to adult readers. This study examines text comprehension, processing, and familiarity judgment provided by adult readers using a number of different approaches (i.e.,…
Descriptors: Reading Processes, Reading Comprehension, Readability, Adults
