NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Ebel, Robert L. – New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 1981
Tests of mental ability provide the most precise and efficient means of assessing a person's structure of knowledge. Tests help in cultivating cognitive competence, in developing and identifying excellence. The harmful consequences of not testing are outlined. (Author/AL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Test Use, Testing, Testing Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ebel, Robert L. – NASSP Bulletin, 1982
Examines and rejects nine reasons given by educators for opposing externally designed tests. Suggests a tenth, unvoiced reason that may be the most valid: that testing may reveal deficiencies in the school's educational program. (PGD)
Descriptors: Accountability, Criteria, Elementary Secondary Education, Opinions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ebel, Robert L. – Arithmetic Teacher, 1979
A defense of testing is given. The author examines opposition to and criticism of testing, and discusses teaching to the test, effects on curricula, and test bias. (MK)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Curriculum, Educational Assessment, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ebel, Robert L. – NASSP Bulletin, 1979
The author concludes that testing in basic education is indispensable. Several objections to external testing are discussed. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Basic Skills, Competency Based Education, Opinions, Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ebel, Robert L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1983
One major reason for the problems of test validation is an overemphasis on the need for empirical validity data, and a failure to recognize the primary importance of explicit verbal definitions of what the test is intended to measure and rational arguments in support of the means chosen for obtaining the measurement. (Author/LC)
Descriptors: Occupational Tests, Performance Tests, Standardized Tests, Statistical Data
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ebel, Robert L. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1982
Reasonable and practical solutions to two major problems confronting the developer of any test of educational achievement (what to measure and how to measure it) are proposed, defended, and defined. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Measurement Techniques, Objective Tests, Test Construction, Test Items
Ebel, Robert L. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1982
Believing that educational reforms are overdue, the author proposes three radical solutions: only validated instructional programs should be implemented, results of systematic public assessments of pupil achievements in learning should be published annually, and teachers should periodically submit evidence of learning achievement in their classes.…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Accountability, Educational Change, Educational Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ebel, Robert L. – Educational Horizons, 1979
The basic rationale for using objective tests is that they are relevant and reliable measures of the most important kind of learning that schools and colleges seek to foster. Measurement of student achievement in learning is necessary, if educational excellence is to be achieved. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Accountability, College Entrance Examinations, Educational Quality
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ebel, Robert L. – Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1979
This essay provides an overview of the controversies surrounding intelligence: its definition, its genetic or environmental basis, its relationship to achievement and learning ability, cultural factors, and the use of intelligence tests in the schools. This article is part of a theme issue on intelligence. (SJL)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Aptitude, Cultural Influences, Definitions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ebel, Robert L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1980
Giving tests and assigning grades are stated to be important aspects of teachers' responsibility for facilitating student learning. Opposition to testing is discussed, objections are criticized, and beneficial consequences of evaluation are listed. It is maintained that tests do not cause cheating, or excessive discouragement, competition, or…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Affective Measures, Cheating