NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Martin, Jessie D.; Shipstead, Zach; Harrison, Tyler L.; Redick, Thomas S.; Bunting, Michael; Engle, Randall W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2020
This study uses a novel framework based on work by Shipstead, Harrison, and Engle (2016) that includes measures of both working memory capacity and fluid intelligence in an attempt to better understand the processes that influence successful reading comprehension at the latent level. Further, we extend this framework to a second educationally…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Vocabulary Development, Short Term Memory, Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Foster, Jeffrey L.; Harrison, Tyler L.; Hicks, Kenny L.; Draheim, Christopher; Redick, Thomas S.; Engle, Randall W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2017
There is a debate about the ability to improve cognitive abilities such as fluid intelligence through training on tasks of working memory capacity. The question addressed in the research presented here is who benefits the most from training: people with low cognitive ability or people with high cognitive ability? Subjects with high and low working…
Descriptors: Short Term Memory, Cognitive Ability, Intelligence, Training
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shipstead, Zach; Engle, Randall W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
One approach to understanding working memory (WM) holds that individual differences in WM capacity arise from the amount of information a person can store in WM over short periods of time. This view is especially prevalent in WM research conducted with the visual arrays task. Within this tradition, many researchers have concluded that the average…
Descriptors: Maintenance, Short Term Memory, Long Term Memory, Interference (Learning)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Unsworth, Nash; Engle, Randall W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2008
Three experiments examined the nature of individual differences in switching the focus of attention in working memory. Participants performed 3 versions of a continuous counting task that required successive updating and switching between counts. Across all 3 experiments, individual differences in working memory span and fluid intelligence were…
Descriptors: Memory, Short Term Memory, Individual Differences, Experiments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Redick, Thomas S.; Calvo, Alejandra; Gay, Catherine E.; Engle, Randall W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011
The ability to temporarily maintain information in order to successfully perform a task is important in many daily activities. However, the ability to quickly and accurately update existing mental representations in distracting situations is also imperative in many of these same circumstances. In the current studies, individuals varying in working…
Descriptors: Individual Differences, Executive Function, Inhibition, Adults
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kane, Michael J.; Poole, Bradley J.; Tuholski, Stephen W.; Engle, Randall W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2006
The executive attention theory of working memory capacity (WMC) proposes that measures of WMC broadly predict higher order cognitive abilities because they tap important and general attention capabilities (R. W. Engle & M. J. Kane, 2004). Previous research demonstrated WMC-related differences in attention tasks that required restraint of habitual…
Descriptors: Memory, Attention, Cognitive Ability, Responses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Unsworth, Nash; Schrock, Josef C.; Engle, Randall W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2004
Performance on antisaccade trials requires the inhibition of a prepotent response (i.e., don't look at the flashing cue) and the generation and execution of a correct saccade in the opposite direction. The authors attempted to further specify the role of working memory (WM) span differences in the antisaccade task. They tested high- and low-span…
Descriptors: Memory, Human Body, Inhibition, Eye Movements