NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Breen, Mara; Watson, Duane G.; Gibson, Edward – Language and Cognitive Processes, 2011
This paper evaluates two classes of hypotheses about how people prosodically segment utterances: (1) meaning-based proposals, with a focus on Watson and Gibson's (2004) proposal, according to which speakers tend to produce boundaries before and after long constituents; and (2) balancing proposals, according to which speakers tend to produce…
Descriptors: Local History, Sentences, Intervals, Verbs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wolf, Florian; Gibson, Edward; Desmet, Timothy – Language and Cognitive Processes, 2004
This paper used self-paced reading to test processing preferences in pronoun interpretation in English two clause sentences. The results demonstrate that people's preferences can be reversed by changing the coherence relation between the clauses. The results are not compatible with the existence of a single all-purpose strategy in pronoun…
Descriptors: Form Classes (Languages), Rhetoric, Sentences, Discourse Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gibson, Edward; Hickok, Gregory – Language and Cognitive Processes, 1993
Pickering and Barry's recent argument against the existence of empty categories (ECs) in human sentence processing is disputed. It is argued here that ECs may still play a linking role between thematic role assigners and wh-phrases. One possible parsing algorithm is given that accounts for Pickering and Barry's data. (28 references) (Author/LB)
Descriptors: Language Processing, Language Research, Linguistic Theory, Sentence Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gibson, Edward; Thomas, James – Language and Cognitive Processes, 1999
Results from an English acceptability-rating experiment are presented that demonstrate that people find doubly nested relative-clause structures just as acceptable when only two verb phrases are included instead of the grammatically required three. Three possible accounts of the results are considered. (Author/VWL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, English, Grammar, Grammatical Acceptability