Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
| Ginger V. Shultz | 2 |
| Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn | 2 |
| Catherine A. Wilhelm | 1 |
| Jasen Chen | 1 |
| Kristin S. Koutmou | 1 |
| Michael N. Petterson | 1 |
| Nicholas F. Garza | 1 |
| Safron L. Milne | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Michigan (Ann Arbor) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSolaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn; Nicholas F. Garza; Catherine A. Wilhelm; Kristin S. Koutmou; Ginger V. Shultz – Journal of Chemical Education, 2022
With the highly interdisciplinary nature of biochemistry, and the diverse range of students taking introductory biochemistry courses, it can be difficult to incorporate authentic applications of course content that appeal broadly to students. However, it is important to engage students' learning at the affective level. One mode to achieve this…
Descriptors: Biochemistry, Student Motivation, Relevance (Education), Assignments
Student Experiences with Peer Review and Revision for Writing-to-Learn in a Chemistry Course Context
Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn; Safron L. Milne; Michael N. Petterson; Jasen Chen; Ginger V. Shultz – Written Communication, 2024
Peer review is useful for providing students with formative feedback, yet it is used less frequently in STEM classrooms and for supporting writing-to-learn (WTL). While research indicates the benefits of incorporating peer review into classrooms, less research is focused on students' perceptions thereof. Such research is important as it speaks to…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Feedback (Response), STEM Education
