Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Meta Analysis | 2 |
| Word Processing | 2 |
| Writing Research | 2 |
| Best Practices | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Formative Evaluation | 1 |
| Handwriting | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| Motivation | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Graham, Steve | 2 |
| Harris, Karen | 1 |
| Hebert, Michael | 1 |
| Morphy, Paul | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMorphy, Paul; Graham, Steve – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2012
Since its advent word processing has become a common writing tool, providing potential advantages over writing by hand. Word processors permit easy revision, produce legible characters quickly, and may provide additional supports (e.g., spellcheckers, speech recognition). Such advantages should remedy common difficulties among weaker…
Descriptors: Word Processing, Writing (Composition), Writing Difficulties, Text Structure
Download full textGraham, Steve; Harris, Karen; Hebert, Michael – Carnegie Corporation of New York, 2011
During this decade there have been numerous efforts to identify instructional practices that improve students' writing. These include "Reading Next" (Biancarosa and Snow, 2004), which provided a set of instructional recommendations for improving writing, and "Writing Next" (Graham and Perin, 2007) and "Writing to Read" (Graham and Hebert, 2010),…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Writing Improvement, Writing Instruction
