NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hsu, Anne S.; Horng, Andy; Griffiths, Thomas L.; Chater, Nick – Cognitive Science, 2017
Identifying patterns in the world requires noticing not only unusual occurrences, but also unusual absences. We examined how people learn from absences, manipulating the extent to which an absence is expected. People can make two types of inferences from the absence of an event: either the event is possible but has not yet occurred, or the event…
Descriptors: Statistical Inference, Bayesian Statistics, Evidence, Prediction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Denison, Stephanie; Bonawitz, Elizabeth; Gopnik, Alison; Griffiths, Thomas L. – Cognition, 2013
We present a proposal--"The Sampling Hypothesis"--suggesting that the variability in young children's responses may be part of a rational strategy for inductive inference. In particular, we argue that young learners may be randomly sampling from the set of possible hypotheses that explain the observed data, producing different hypotheses with…
Descriptors: Sampling, Probability, Preschool Children, Inferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Williams, Joseph J.; Griffiths, Thomas L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
Errors in detecting randomness are often explained in terms of biases and misconceptions. We propose and provide evidence for an account that characterizes the contribution of the inherent statistical difficulty of the task. Our account is based on a Bayesian statistical analysis, focusing on the fact that a random process is a special case of…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Bias, Misconceptions, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Perfors, Amy; Tenenbaum, Joshua B.; Griffiths, Thomas L.; Xu, Fei – Cognition, 2011
We present an introduction to Bayesian inference as it is used in probabilistic models of cognitive development. Our goal is to provide an intuitive and accessible guide to the "what", the "how", and the "why" of the Bayesian approach: what sorts of problems and data the framework is most relevant for, and how and why it may be useful for…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Cognitive Psychology, Inferences, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Griffiths, Thomas L.; Steyvers, Mark; Tenenbaum, Joshua B. – Psychological Review, 2007
Processing language requires the retrieval of concepts from memory in response to an ongoing stream of information. This retrieval is facilitated if one can infer the gist of a sentence, conversation, or document and use that gist to predict related concepts and disambiguate words. This article analyzes the abstract computational problem…
Descriptors: Language Processing, Information Retrieval, Fundamental Concepts, Syntax
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Griffiths, Thomas L.; Tenenbaum, Joshua B. – Cognition, 2007
People's reactions to coincidences are often cited as an illustration of the irrationality of human reasoning about chance. We argue that coincidences may be better understood in terms of rational statistical inference, based on their functional role in processes of causal discovery and theory revision. We present a formal definition of…
Descriptors: Probability, Statistical Inference, Bayesian Statistics, Theories
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Griffiths, Thomas L.; Kalish, Michael L. – Cognitive Science, 2007
Languages are transmitted from person to person and generation to generation via a process of iterated learning: people learn a language from other people who once learned that language themselves. We analyze the consequences of iterated learning for learning algorithms based on the principles of Bayesian inference, assuming that learners compute…
Descriptors: Probability, Diachronic Linguistics, Statistical Inference, Language Universals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Griffiths, Thomas L.; Tenenbaum, Joshua B. – Cognitive Psychology, 2005
We present a framework for the rational analysis of elemental causal induction--learning about the existence of a relationship between a single cause and effect--based upon causal graphical models. This framework makes precise the distinction between causal structure and causal strength: the difference between asking whether a causal relationship…
Descriptors: Probability, Logical Thinking, Inferences, Causal Models