Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Mixed Methods Research | 3 |
Qualitative Research | 2 |
Research Methodology | 2 |
Statistical Inference | 2 |
Case Studies | 1 |
Causal Models | 1 |
Credibility | 1 |
Educational Research | 1 |
Evaluation Methods | 1 |
Evidence | 1 |
Inquiry | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Research in the Schools | 3 |
Author
Hitchcock, John H. | 3 |
Johanson, George A. | 1 |
Johnson, R. Burke | 1 |
Nastasi, Bonnie K. | 1 |
Newman, Isadore | 1 |
Schoonenboom, Judith | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Using Qualitative and Phenomenological Principles to Assess Stakeholders' Perceptions of Probability
Newman, Isadore; Hitchcock, John H.; Nastasi, Bonnie K. – Research in the Schools, 2017
Any attempt to influence behavior by sharing a research finding that makes a probabilistic statement (e.g., a p value) should necessarily entail consideration of how consumers of the information might interpret this information. Such consideration can be informed, at least in part, by applying phenomenological principles of inquiry. This does not…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Phenomenology, Stakeholders, Mixed Methods Research
Hitchcock, John H.; Johnson, R. Burke; Schoonenboom, Judith – Research in the Schools, 2018
The central purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the many ways in which special educators can generate and think about causal inference to inform policy and practice. Consideration of causality across different lenses can be carried out by engaging in multiple method and mixed methods ways of thinking about inference. This article…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Statistical Inference, Special Education, Educational Research
Hitchcock, John H.; Johanson, George A. – Research in the Schools, 2015
Understanding the reason(s) for Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in the context of measurement is difficult. Although identifying potential DIF items is typically a statistical endeavor, understanding the reasons for DIF (and item repair or replacement) might require investigations that can be informed by qualitative work. Such work is…
Descriptors: Mixed Methods Research, Test Items, Item Analysis, Measurement