Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Evaluation Methods | 4 |
Evaluation Problems | 4 |
Program Evaluation | 3 |
Credibility | 2 |
Evaluation Utilization | 2 |
Evaluators | 2 |
Social Change | 2 |
Advocacy | 1 |
Concept Formation | 1 |
Cultural Pluralism | 1 |
Democracy | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
House, Ernest R. | 4 |
Howe, Kenneth R. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Book/Product Reviews | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
House, Ernest R. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2008
Drug studies are often cited as the best exemplars of evaluation design. However, many of these studies are seriously biased in favor of positive findings for the drugs evaluated, even to the point where dangerous effects are hidden. In spite of using randomized designs and double blinding, drug companies have found ways of producing the results…
Descriptors: Integrity, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Experimenter Characteristics

House, Ernest R.; Howe, Kenneth R. – American Journal of Evaluation, 1998
Chelimsky, former head of the Program Evaluation and Methodology Division of the General Accounting Office, suggested that advocacy by evaluators destroys their credibility. Evaluators should, this author argues, be advocates for democracy and the public interest, with the question being how explicitly and how defensibly. (SLD)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Credibility, Democracy, Ethics

House, Ernest R. – Evaluation Practice, 1994
An optimistic view of the potential of evaluation to be a force for social improvement is presented. The most important unfinished task for evaluation may be to expand the logic of value judgments. In addition, the social usefulness of evaluation will depend on its credibility and the professionalism of evaluators. (SLD)
Descriptors: Credibility, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Evaluative Thinking

House, Ernest R. – Educational Researcher, 1990
Discusses the following aspects of educational evaluation: (1) structural changes; (2) conceptual changes; (3) mixed methods and unraveling consensus; (4) utilization of findings; (5) the role of values; and (6) the role of politics. Discusses how evaluation moved from monolithic to pluralistic, reflecting the change from consensus to pluralism in…
Descriptors: Concept Formation, Cultural Pluralism, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems