NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)2
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 26 results Save | Export
House, Ernest R. – Education and the Public Interest Center, 2009
The Fordham Institute conducted a survey of experts who are advocates of private education, soliciting opinions about how private schools accepting public monies, such as from voucher programs, should be held accountable. The experts were in agreement that private schools should not accept regulation of their day-to-day operations, but disagreed…
Descriptors: Expertise, Private Education, Private Schools, Standardized Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
House, Ernest R. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2008
Drug studies are often cited as the best exemplars of evaluation design. However, many of these studies are seriously biased in favor of positive findings for the drugs evaluated, even to the point where dangerous effects are hidden. In spite of using randomized designs and double blinding, drug companies have found ways of producing the results…
Descriptors: Integrity, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Experimenter Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
House, Ernest R.; Howe, Kenneth R. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Presents a framework for judging evaluations on the basis of their potential for democratic deliberation that includes the interrelated requirements of inclusion, dialogue, and deliberation. Operationalizes these requirements in 10 questions to guide evaluation and meta-evaluation from a democratic viewpoint. (SLD)
Descriptors: Democracy, Evaluation Methods, Meta Analysis, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
House, Ernest R. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1983
Our scientific conceptions of evaluation are strongly influenced by underlying, deep-seated metaphors. This analysis draws upon recent philosophic work concerning the role of metaphors in all thought processes. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Evaluation Methods, Language Patterns, Metaphors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
House, Ernest R.; Howe, Kenneth R. – American Journal of Evaluation, 1998
Chelimsky, former head of the Program Evaluation and Methodology Division of the General Accounting Office, suggested that advocacy by evaluators destroys their credibility. Evaluators should, this author argues, be advocates for democracy and the public interest, with the question being how explicitly and how defensibly. (SLD)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Credibility, Democracy, Ethics
House, Ernest R.; And Others – Phi Delta Kappan, 1974
Among nearly 40 States attempting to apply the accountability principle to school operation by legislative fiat, Michigan is clearly a leader. This exhaustive study reveals disturbing defects in Michigan's plan, particularly in the assessment component. (Editor)
Descriptors: Accountability, Educational Assessment, Educational Needs, Educational Objectives
House, Ernest R.; And Others – Phi Delta Kappan, 1978
Outlines problems with the U. S. Office of Education sponsored report on Project Follow Through. The problems are in the areas of classification of models, measurement techniques, methods of analysis, and fairness. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Basic Skills, Data Analysis, Early Childhood Education, Evaluation Methods
House, Ernest R. – 1981
The thesis of this paper is that the humanistic mode of inquiry is underemployed in evaluation studies and the future evaluation of Follow Through could profitably use humanistic approaches. The original Follow Through evaluation was based on the assumption that the world consists of a single system explainable by appropriate methods; the…
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Evaluation Methods, Humanities, Program Development
House, Ernest R.; And Others – 1971
Data from a Class Activities Questionnaire was used in the evaluation of the state gifted program in Illinois to determine patterns of cognitive and affective emphasis in gifted and average classes. Significant differences were found in the degree of emphasis on higher thought processes, classroom focus, and classroom climate. Significant…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Educational Programs
House, Ernest R.; And Others – 1971
A report of the Illinois Gifted Program Evaluation, the document first presents origins, policies, and scope of the reimbursement section of the Illinois Plan for Program Development for Gifted Children. Outlined is the evaluation design, in which subjects were 34 school districts representing a 10% stratified random sample of 340 districts. Each…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Exceptional Child Education, Gifted, Program Descriptions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
House, Ernest R. – Evaluation Practice, 1997
The large government market in evaluation that has developed in recent years does not follow the idealized image of open markets because of the contracting process, which means that a few firms conduct most evaluations. To produce honest, unbiased evaluations, evaluation ethics must take government market factors into consideration. (SLD)
Descriptors: Contracts, Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Farrar, Eleanor; House, Ernest R. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1983
The evaluators of Push/Excel assumed that it was a systematically developed program with measurable outcomes, not a charismatically inspired movement whose effects would be hard to pin down. As a result, neither the program nor the evaluation approach used were adequately tested. (Author)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Program Development, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
House, Ernest R. – New Directions for Higher Education, 1982
Different approaches to evaluation are described: systems analysis, behavioral objectives, professional review, and case study. For an evaluation system to operate, it must be perceived as being fair; the legitimacy of evaluation is dependent on the issue of fairness. (MLW)
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, Case Studies, College Programs, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
House, Ernest R.; And Others – Educational Leadership, 1978
Examines the Abt Associates, Inc. findings on the effectiveness of Project Follow Through and disputes the report's conclusion that so-called "basic skills" approaches to the schooling of poor children are superior to other methods. (Author)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Basic Skills, Compensatory Education, Early Childhood Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
House, Ernest R. – Educational Theory, 1980
Evaluation techniques and practices do not belong to a particular theory of justice. Systems analysis evaluation consists of defining quantitative outcome measures of program success and the establishment of causal links between this measure and the program by experimental design. (JN)
Descriptors: Democratic Values, Educational Assessment, Educational Philosophy, Evaluation Methods
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2