Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Attribution Theory | 2 |
| Causal Models | 2 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Cognitive Psychology | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Evaluative Thinking | 1 |
| Intervention | 1 |
| Observation | 1 |
| Prediction | 1 |
| Responsibility | 1 |
Source
| Cognitive Science | 2 |
Author
| Lagnado, David A. | 2 |
| Gerstenberg, Tobias | 1 |
| Sloman, Steven A. | 1 |
| Zultan, Ro'i | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLagnado, David A.; Gerstenberg, Tobias; Zultan, Ro'i – Cognitive Science, 2013
How do people attribute responsibility in situations where the contributions of multiple agents combine to produce a joint outcome? The prevalence of over-determination in such cases makes this a difficult problem for counterfactual theories of causal responsibility. In this article, we explore a general framework for assigning responsibility in…
Descriptors: Attribution Theory, Causal Models, Responsibility, Cognitive Psychology
Sloman, Steven A.; Lagnado, David A. – Cognitive Science, 2005
A normative framework for modeling causal and counterfactual reasoning has been proposed by Spirtes, Glymour, and Scheines (1993; cf. Pearl, 2000). The framework takes as fundamental that reasoning from observation and intervention differ. Intervention includes actual manipulation as well as counterfactual manipulation of a model via thought. To…
Descriptors: Observation, Intervention, Causal Models, Prediction
