Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 5 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 8 |
Descriptor
Source
Computer Science Education | 3 |
ACM Transactions on Computing… | 2 |
Assessment & Evaluation in… | 1 |
IEEE Transactions on Learning… | 1 |
Teaching and Learning… | 1 |
Author
Luxton-Reilly, Andrew | 8 |
Denny, Paul | 5 |
Indriasari, Theresia Devi | 2 |
Tempero, Ewan | 2 |
Allen, Oliver | 1 |
Cukierman, Diana | 1 |
Downs, Xavier | 1 |
Giacaman, Nasser | 1 |
Hamer, John | 1 |
Kirk, Diana | 1 |
Lottridge, Danielle | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 8 |
Journal Articles | 7 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 5 |
Postsecondary Education | 5 |
High Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Teachers | 1 |
Location
New Zealand | 3 |
Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Allen, Oliver; Downs, Xavier; Varoy, Elliot; Luxton-Reilly, Andrew; Giacaman, Nasser – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2022
Object-oriented programming (OOP) is not only an integral part of computing degrees but also a requirement in non-computing majors such as engineering. Understanding OOP concepts can be difficult for novice programmers, and often leads to the development of misconceptions. This is exacerbated when the discipline requires students to learn a…
Descriptors: Programming, Programming Languages, Majors (Students), Learning Activities
Whalley, Jacqueline; Settle, Amber; Luxton-Reilly, Andrew – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2023
Debugging is a core skill required by programmers, yet we know little about how to effectively teach the process of debugging. The challenges of learning debugging are compounded for novices who lack experience and are still learning the tools they need to program effectively. In this work, we report a case study in which we used a think-aloud…
Descriptors: Protocol Analysis, Novices, Troubleshooting, Programming
Indriasari, Theresia Devi; Luxton-Reilly, Andrew; Denny, Paul – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2020
Peer review is the standard process within academia for maintaining publication quality, but it is also widely employed in other settings, such as education and industry, for improving work quality and for generating actionable feedback to content authors. For example, in the software industry peer review of program source code--or peer code…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Programming, Higher Education, Computer Science Education
Indriasari, Theresia Devi; Denny, Paul; Lottridge, Danielle; Luxton-Reilly, Andrew – Computer Science Education, 2023
Background and Context: Peer code review activities provide well-documented benefits to students in programming courses. Students develop relevant skills through exposure to alternative coding solutions, producing and receiving feedback, and collaboration with peers. Despite these benefits, low student motivation has been identified as one of the…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Student Motivation, Cooperative Learning, Programming
Kirk, Diana; Luxton-Reilly, Andrew; Tempero, Ewan – Teaching and Learning Research Initiative, 2020
New Zealand has a shortage of skilled workers in information technology (IT). Skills relating to computer programming (e.g., software engineer, applications programmer, software tester, web developer) all appear on the 2019 Long Term Skill Shortage List published by Immigration New Zealand. In many parts of the world, demand for computing…
Descriptors: Information Technology, Foreign Countries, Skilled Workers, Computer Science Education
Hamer, John; Purchase, Helen; Luxton-Reilly, Andrew; Denny, Paul – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2015
We report on a study comparing peer feedback with feedback written by tutors on a large, undergraduate software engineering programming class. Feedback generated by peers is generally held to be of lower quality to feedback from experienced tutors, and this study sought to explore the extent and nature of this difference. We looked at how…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Programming, Engineering Education, Undergraduate Students
Denny, Paul; Cukierman, Diana; Luxton-Reilly, Andrew; Tempero, Ewan – Computer Science Education, 2012
Traditionally, learning resources are created by an instructor and distributed to their students. A contributing-student pedagogy (CSP) is one in which this responsibility shifts, placing students in control of creating the resources and sharing them with their peers. Technology plays a central role in supporting the collection and distribution of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Computer Science Education, Programming, Web 2.0 Technologies
Luxton-Reilly, Andrew; Denny, Paul – Computer Science Education, 2010
We present an innovative pedagogical approach that we call "constructive evaluation," which shifts students from being consumers of knowledge to participants in a community of peers engaged in actively producing and sharing knowledge. Students are required to author a question that assesses one or more of the learning outcomes of a course. In…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Learning Theories, Item Banks, Educational Resources