Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Item Response Theory | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1 |
| Behavior Problems | 1 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Equated Scores | 1 |
| Equations (Mathematics) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Meijer, Rob R. | 2 |
| Tendeiro, Jorge N. | 2 |
| Egberink, Iris J. L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Netherlands | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkEgberink, Iris J. L.; Meijer, Rob R.; Tendeiro, Jorge N. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2015
A popular method to assess measurement invariance of a particular item is based on likelihood ratio tests with all other items as anchor items. The results of this method are often only reported in terms of statistical significance, and researchers proposed different methods to empirically select anchor items. It is unclear, however, how many…
Descriptors: Personality Measures, Computer Assisted Testing, Measurement, Test Items
Tendeiro, Jorge N.; Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
This article extends the work by Armstrong and Shi on CUmulative SUM (CUSUM) person-fit methodology. The authors present new theoretical considerations concerning the use of CUSUM person-fit statistics based on likelihood ratios for the purpose of detecting cheating and random guessing by individual test takers. According to the Neyman-Pearson…
Descriptors: Cheating, Individual Testing, Adaptive Testing, Statistics
