Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Adaptive Testing | 2 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Behavior Problems | 1 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Equations (Mathematics) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Individual Testing | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Q Methodology | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Meijer, Rob R. | 2 |
| Tendeiro, Jorge N. | 1 |
| van Krimpen-Stoop, Edith M.… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkTendeiro, Jorge N.; Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
This article extends the work by Armstrong and Shi on CUmulative SUM (CUSUM) person-fit methodology. The authors present new theoretical considerations concerning the use of CUSUM person-fit statistics based on likelihood ratios for the purpose of detecting cheating and random guessing by individual test takers. According to the Neyman-Pearson…
Descriptors: Cheating, Individual Testing, Adaptive Testing, Statistics
Peer reviewedvan Krimpen-Stoop, Edith M. L. A.; Meijer, Rob R. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2001
Proposed person-fit statistics that are designed for use in a computerized adaptive test (CAT) and derived critical values for these statistics using cumulative sum (CUSUM) procedures so that item-score patterns can be classified as fitting or misfitting. Compared nominal Type I errors with empirical Type I errors through simulation studies. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Simulation, Test Construction
