Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 5 |
Test Items | 5 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 4 |
Item Response Theory | 4 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Statistical Distributions | 2 |
Ability | 1 |
Behavior Problems | 1 |
Cheating | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Applied Psychological… | 3 |
Author
Meijer, Rob R. | 5 |
van Krimpen-Stoop, Edith M.… | 3 |
Nering, Michael L. | 1 |
Tendeiro, Jorge N. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Tendeiro, Jorge N.; Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
This article extends the work by Armstrong and Shi on CUmulative SUM (CUSUM) person-fit methodology. The authors present new theoretical considerations concerning the use of CUSUM person-fit statistics based on likelihood ratios for the purpose of detecting cheating and random guessing by individual test takers. According to the Neyman-Pearson…
Descriptors: Cheating, Individual Testing, Adaptive Testing, Statistics

van Krimpen-Stoop, Edith M. L. A.; Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2002
Compared the nominal and empirical null distributions of the standardized log-likelihood statistic for polytomous items for paper-and-pencil (P&P) and computerized adaptive tests (CATs). Results show that the empirical distribution of the statistic differed from the assumed standard normal distribution for both P&P tests and CATs. Also…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Response Theory, Statistical Distributions

Meijer, Rob R.; Nering, Michael L. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1999
Provides an overview of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and introduces contributions to this special issue. CAT elements discussed include item selection, estimation of the latent trait, item exposure, measurement precision, and item-bank development. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Banks, Selection
van Krimpen-Stoop, Edith M. L. A.; Meijer, Rob R. – 2000
Item scores that do not fit an assumed item response theory model may cause the latent trait value to be estimated inaccurately. For computerized adaptive tests (CAT) with dichotomous items, several person-fit statistics for detecting nonfitting item score patterns have been proposed. Both for paper-and-pencil (P&P) test and CATs, detection of…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Goodness of Fit, Item Response Theory
Meijer, Rob R.; van Krimpen-Stoop, Edith M. L. A. – 1998
Several person-fit statistics have been proposed to detect item score patterns that do not fit an item response theory model. To classify response patterns as not fitting a model, a distribution of a person-fit statistic is needed. The null distributions of several fit statistics have been investigated using conventionally administered tests, but…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Foreign Countries, Item Response Theory