Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Memory | 6 |
Stimuli | 6 |
Experiments | 4 |
Undergraduate Students | 4 |
Recognition (Psychology) | 3 |
Attention | 2 |
Auditory Stimuli | 2 |
Cognitive Processes | 2 |
Cues | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Priming | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Mulligan, Neil W. | 6 |
Dew, Ilana T. Z. | 1 |
Osborn, Katherine | 1 |
Peterson, Daniel | 1 |
Peterson, Daniel J. | 1 |
Picklesimer, Milton | 1 |
Smith, S. Adam | 1 |
Spataro, Pietro | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
North Carolina | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mulligan, Neil W.; Smith, S. Adam; Spataro, Pietro – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
Stimuli co-occurring with targets in a detection task are better remembered than stimuli co-occurring with distractors--the attentional boost effect (ABE). The ABE is of interest because it is an exception to the usual finding that divided attention during encoding impairs memory. The effect has been demonstrated in tests of item memory but it is…
Descriptors: Memory, Attention, Recognition (Psychology), Priming
Peterson, Daniel J.; Mulligan, Neil W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
One of the foundational principles of human memory is that repetition (i.e., being presented with a stimulus multiple times) improves recall. In the current study a group of participants who studied a list of cue-target pairs twice recalled fewer targets than a group who studied the pairs only once, a negative repetition effect. Such a…
Descriptors: Memory, Testing, Repetition, Stimuli
Mulligan, Neil W.; Picklesimer, Milton – Journal of Memory and Language, 2012
Dual-process models differentiate between two bases of memory, recollection and familiarity. It is routinely claimed that deeper, semantic encoding enhances recollection relative to shallow, non-semantic encoding, and that recollection is largely a product of semantic, elaborative rehearsal. The present experiments show that this is not always the…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Semantics, Computational Linguistics, Familiarity
Mulligan, Neil W.; Osborn, Katherine – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2009
The modality-match effect in recognition refers to superior memory for words presented in the same modality at study and test. Prior research on this effect is ambiguous and inconsistent. The present study demonstrates that the modality-match effect is found when modality is rendered salient at either encoding or retrieval. Specifically, in…
Descriptors: Recognition (Psychology), Recall (Psychology), Evaluation, Experiments
Mulligan, Neil W.; Dew, Ilana T. Z. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2009
The generation manipulation has been critical in delineating differences between implicit and explicit memory. In contrast to past research, the present experiments indicate that generating from a rhyme cue produces as much perceptual priming as does reading. This is demonstrated for 3 visual priming tasks: perceptual identification, word-fragment…
Descriptors: Memory, Priming, Perception, Identification
Mulligan, Neil W.; Peterson, Daniel – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2008
Prior research on implicit memory appeared to support 3 generalizations: Conceptual tests are affected by divided attention, perceptual tasks are affected by certain divided-attention manipulations, and all types of priming are affected by selective attention. These generalizations are challenged in experiments using the implicit tests of category…
Descriptors: Attention, Attention Deficit Disorders, Memory, Stimuli