Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Mixed Methods Research | 2 |
| Sampling | 2 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Empowerment | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Focus Groups | 1 |
| Heuristics | 1 |
| Participation | 1 |
| Q Methodology | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. | 2 |
| Collins, Kathleen M. T. | 1 |
| Frels, Rebecca K. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textOnwuegbuzie, Anthony J.; Frels, Rebecca K. – Journal of Educational Issues, 2015
Although focus group discussions (FGDs) represent a popular data collection tool for researchers, they contain an extremely serious flaw: FGD researchers have ultimate power over all decisions made at every stage of the research process--from the conceptualization of the research, to the planning of the research study, to the implementation of the…
Descriptors: Focus Groups, Research Methodology, Decision Making, Empowerment
Direct linkCollins, Kathleen M. T.; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2013
The goal of this chapter is to recommend quality criteria to guide evaluators' selections of sampling designs when mixing approaches. First, we contextualize our discussion of quality criteria and sampling designs by discussing the concept of interpretive consistency and how it impacts sampling decisions. Embedded in this discussion are…
Descriptors: Sampling, Mixed Methods Research, Evaluators, Q Methodology
