NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Popham, W. James – Teacher Educator, 2011
This article presents reflections and guidance concerning assessment literacy in teacher education. Previous inadequacies in teacher training in educational assessment highlight the need for teachers to be assessment literate. Assessment literacy consists of an individual's understanding of the fundamental assessment concepts and procedures deemed…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Beginning Teachers, Teacher Educators, Literacy
Popham, W. James – Phi Delta Kappan, 2009
Any reauthorized version of the No Child Left Behind Act is almost certain to call for monitoring students' academic progress. However, the current method for such monitoring is educationally harmful. The author offers five recommendations for building a more defensible means to monitor student progress.
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Academic Achievement, Accountability
Popham, W. James – Principal Leadership, 2008
Formative assessment is a planned process that uses assessments to inform changes in instruction or learning. Because of its focus on instruction and learning, formative assessment is based in the classroom, although school-level structures, such as learning communities, can support the process. In this article, the author presents seven…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Principals, Success, Secondary Schools
Popham, W. James – Phi Delta Kappan, 2007
The "instructional sensitivity" of a test represents the degree to which students' performances on that test accurately reflect the quality of the instruction that was provided specifically to promote students' mastery of whatever is being assessed. In other words, an instructionally "sensitive" test would be capable of distinguishing between…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Accountability, Scores, Tests
Popham, W. James – Center on Education Policy, 2008
Recognizing the potential of accountability tests to alter classroom instruction, an overview is provided of the federal government's past influence on educational assessments. The past 50 years has witnessed the function of federally engendered educational assessments shift from monitoring the use of federal funds for programs prescribed for…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation, Educational Assessment, Federal Regulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Popham, W. James – Educational Leadership, 2005
A non-cushioned adequate yearly progress (AYP) sledgehammer will start pounding many schools from the beginning of 2005. The AYP-failed schools that receive Title 1 No Child Behind Policy (NCLB) funds will be placed on a sanction-laden improvement track than can improve a school all the way into nonexistence.
Descriptors: Educational Improvement, Federal Legislation, Accountability, Academic Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Popham, W. James – Educational Leadership, 2004
The importance of educational accountability and assessment literacy is recognized as a long-term challenge to the educational system. The complexities in becoming an assessment literate and provide an opportunity to the educators to display their effective learning is discussed.
Descriptors: Accountability, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Educational Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Popham, W. James – Teachers College Record, 2004
Specialists in curriculum, instruction, and assessment typically work with colleagues in their own field. It is argued that such isolationism is educationally harmful, especially during today's era of heightened accountability for educators. To diminish excessive specialization by curriculum, instruction, and assessment personnel, amelioration…
Descriptors: State Departments of Education, Specialists, Curriculum, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Popham, W. James – Educational Leadership, 2005
In this article, the author draws attention to the fact that in school evaluations, students will improve on state-mandated tests, but the improved scores will not influence a school's adequate yearly progress (AYP) status because those students' scores do not cross the proficiency point. A state's proficiency point on each of its standardized…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Federal Legislation, Educational Policy