Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Feedback (Response) | 2 |
| Formative Evaluation | 2 |
| Programming | 2 |
| Academic Persistence | 1 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Assignments | 1 |
| Coding | 1 |
| Data | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Barnes, Tiffany | 2 |
| Marwan, Samiha | 2 |
| Price, Thomas W. | 2 |
| Akram, Bita | 1 |
| Chi, Min | 1 |
| Menezes, Ian | 1 |
| Shi, Yang | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Marwan, Samiha; Akram, Bita; Barnes, Tiffany; Price, Thomas W. – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2022
Theories on learning show that formative feedback that is immediate, specific, corrective, and positive is essential to improve novice students' motivation and learning. However, most prior work on programming feedback focuses on highlighting student's mistakes, or detecting failed test cases after they submit a solution. In this article, we…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Formative Evaluation, Programming, Coding
Marwan, Samiha; Shi, Yang; Menezes, Ian; Chi, Min; Barnes, Tiffany; Price, Thomas W. – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2021
Feedback on how students progress through completing subgoals can improve students' learning and motivation in programming. Detecting subgoal completion is a challenging task, and most learning environments do so either with "expert-authored" models or with "data-driven" models. Both models have advantages that are…
Descriptors: Expertise, Models, Feedback (Response), Identification

Peer reviewed
Direct link
