NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scriven, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2016
It is argued here that the general view, especially in the social sciences, of the specific status of evaluation is still deeply impregnated with completely absurd misrepresentations. A number of the worst are documented and refuted here, along with some suggestions as to their roots. It is stressed that the consequences of this tangled net of…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Misconceptions, Evaluation Methods, Social Sciences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Donaldson, Stewart I.; Gooler, Laura E.; Scriven, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Discusses the sources and signs of excessive evaluation anxiety in program evaluation and provides some strategies to help evaluators prevent and manage this common problem. Shows how more than technical skills are required to conduct high quality program evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Anxiety, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Scriven, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 1998
The first part of this paper discusses the nature of theories and why some understanding of this abstract subject is of value in the practice of evaluation. The second part looks at the dependence of good practice on a minimalist theory of evaluation and what such a theory entails. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Theories, Theory Practice Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Coryn, Chris L. S.; Hattie, John A.; Scriven, Michael; Hartmann, David J. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
This research describes, classifies, and comparatively evaluates national models and mechanisms used to evaluate research and allocate research funding in 16 countries. Although these models and mechanisms vary widely in terms of how research is evaluated and financed, nearly all share the common characteristic of relating funding to some measure…
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Comparative Analysis, Resource Allocation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Scriven, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2001
Focuses on the ideal future of evaluation as a discipline, including evaluation in the nonacademic world and evaluation as it applies to elementary, secondary, and higher education. In the ideal future, evaluation will be fully accepted as a key discipline and will be fully used in rational discourse and policy decisions. (SLD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Higher Education