Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Credibility | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Evaluators | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Validity | 2 |
Administrative Problems | 1 |
Bias | 1 |
Classification | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
Ethics | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Scriven, Michael | 2 |
Coryn, Chris L. S. | 1 |
Hartmann, David J. | 1 |
Hattie, John A. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Coryn, Chris L. S.; Hattie, John A.; Scriven, Michael; Hartmann, David J. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
This research describes, classifies, and comparatively evaluates national models and mechanisms used to evaluate research and allocate research funding in 16 countries. Although these models and mechanisms vary widely in terms of how research is evaluated and financed, nearly all share the common characteristic of relating funding to some measure…
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Comparative Analysis, Resource Allocation
Scriven, Michael – 1975
Selected aspects of the problem of obtaining unbiased program or product evaluation are discussed. An evaluator who is a member of the project staff will have difficulty producing an evaluation which is credible and valid. Project monitors will also have a problem since they are often required to assume the conflicting roles of external evaluator…
Descriptors: Administrative Problems, Bias, Credibility, Evaluation Methods