NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – 1981
The dimensions of educational evaluation include conceptualization and technology of evaluation. The methods have been drawn from the area of educational and psychological research. The techniques of evaluation need to serve the information needs of clients, address the central value issues, deal with situational realities, meet requirements of…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Researchers, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – 1974
This manual includes two self-instructional modules relating to the evaluation efforts of Michael Scriven and Daniel L. Stufflebeam. By working through the first module the reader can develop a basic understanding of Scriven's three main evaluation contributions: formative-summative evaluation, goal-free evaluation, and the Pathway Comparison…
Descriptors: Autoinstructional Aids, Check Lists, Educational Objectives, Evaluation
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – 1971
An evaluative symposium conducted during the 1971 Annual Meeting of the AERA offered the following critiques on "Educational Evaluation and Decision Making," a book prepared by the Phi Delta Kappa Study Committee on Evaluation: "A Critique of the Report of the Phi Delta Kappa Study Committee on Evaluation" (Henry M. Brickell); "A Critique of the…
Descriptors: Accountability, Book Reviews, Conferences, Decision Making
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – 1968
The need for competent formal evaluation programs, particularly for new federally assisted programs, is expressed. Problems in defining educational evaluation and its requirements, in designing such evaluations, and 3 possible sources of faulty conceptual bases for evaluations, are presented. An attempt is made to define evaluation in general, to…
Descriptors: Accountability, Decision Making, Educational Change, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stufflebeam, Daniel L.; And Others – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1980
Thirteen evaluation methods are analyzed by orientation. Typically, clients want politically advantageous studies; evaluators prefer questions-oriented studies; audiences favor a values orientation. Evaluators must recognize the narrow scope of question-oriented studies and the perspectives of client and audience. (CP)
Descriptors: Accountability, Certification, Consumer Protection, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stufflebeam, Daniel L.; Welch, Wayne L. – Educational Administration Quarterly, 1986
Reviews empirical studies that have been conducted on program evaluation in large United States school districts. Provides information for use in assessing and improving evaluation studies and systems at the precollege level and in providing direction for further research. Sixty-seven footnotes are appended. (IW)
Descriptors: Audience Analysis, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation