Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
Tindal, Gerald | 3 |
Almond, Patricia | 1 |
Alonzo, Julie | 1 |
Anderson, Daniel | 1 |
Farley, Dan | 1 |
Harniss, Mark | 1 |
Heath, Bill | 1 |
Hollenbeck, Keith | 1 |
Lai, Cheng Fei | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Oregon | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Anderson, Daniel; Farley, Dan; Tindal, Gerald – Journal of Special Education, 2015
Students with significant cognitive disabilities present an assessment dilemma that centers on access and validity in large-scale testing programs. Typically, access is improved by eliminating construct-irrelevant barriers, while validity is improved, in part, through test standardization. In this article, one state's alternate assessment data…
Descriptors: Mental Retardation, Evaluation Methods, Student Evaluation, Standardized Tests
Alonzo, Julie; Lai, Cheng Fei; Tindal, Gerald – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2009
In this technical report, we describe the development and piloting of a series of mathematics progress monitoring measures intended for use with students in grades kindergarten through eighth grade. These measures, available as part of easyCBM[TM], an online progress monitoring assessment system, were developed in 2007 and 2008 and administered to…
Descriptors: Grade 4, General Education, Response to Intervention, Access to Education
Tindal, Gerald; Heath, Bill; Hollenbeck, Keith; Almond, Patricia; Harniss, Mark – 1998
In this study, fourth-grade special education students (n=78) and general education students (n=403) took a large-scale statewide test using standard test administration procedure and two major accommodations addressing response conditions and test administration. On both reading and math tests, students bubbled in answers on a separate sheet (the…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Educational Assessment, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods