Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Evaluation Methods | 7 |
Test Bias | 7 |
Simulation | 6 |
Test Items | 6 |
Item Response Theory | 5 |
Models | 3 |
Error of Measurement | 2 |
Item Analysis | 2 |
Measurement Techniques | 2 |
Monte Carlo Methods | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational and Psychological… | 3 |
Applied Measurement in… | 2 |
Applied Psychological… | 1 |
Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Author
Wang, Wen-Chung | 7 |
Su, Ya-Hui | 3 |
Shih, Ching-Lin | 2 |
Li, Xiaomin | 1 |
Sun, Guo-Wei | 1 |
Wilson, Mark | 1 |
Yang, Chih-Chien | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Taiwan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Assessment of Differential Item Functioning under Cognitive Diagnosis Models: The DINA Model Example
Li, Xiaomin; Wang, Wen-Chung – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2015
The assessment of differential item functioning (DIF) is routinely conducted to ensure test fairness and validity. Although many DIF assessment methods have been developed in the context of classical test theory and item response theory, they are not applicable for cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs), as the underlying latent attributes of CDMs are…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Models, Cognitive Measurement, Evaluation Methods
Wang, Wen-Chung; Shih, Ching-Lin; Sun, Guo-Wei – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2012
The DIF-free-then-DIF (DFTD) strategy consists of two steps: (a) select a set of items that are the most likely to be DIF-free and (b) assess the other items for DIF (differential item functioning) using the designated items as anchors. The rank-based method together with the computer software IRTLRDIF can select a set of DIF-free polytomous items…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Test Items, Item Response Theory, Evaluation Methods
Wang, Wen-Chung; Shih, Ching-Lin; Yang, Chih-Chien – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2009
This study implements a scale purification procedure onto the standard MIMIC method for differential item functioning (DIF) detection and assesses its performance through a series of simulations. It is found that the MIMIC method with scale purification (denoted as M-SP) outperforms the standard MIMIC method (denoted as M-ST) in controlling…
Descriptors: Test Items, Measures (Individuals), Test Bias, Evaluation Research
Wang, Wen-Chung; Su, Ya-Hui – Applied Measurement in Education, 2004
In this study we investigated the effects of the average signed area (ASA) between the item characteristic curves of the reference and focal groups and three test purification procedures on the uniform differential item functioning (DIF) detection via the Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) method through Monte Carlo simulations. The results showed that ASA,…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Test Items
Su, Ya-Hui; Wang, Wen-Chung – Applied Measurement in Education, 2005
Simulations were conducted to investigate factors that influence the Mantel, generalized Mantel-Haenszel (GMH), and logistic discriminant function analysis (LDFA) methods in assessing differential item functioning (DIF) for polytomous items. The results show that the magnitude of DIF contamination in the matching score, as measured by the average…
Descriptors: Discriminant Analysis, Test Bias, Research Methodology, Test Items
Wang, Wen-Chung; Wilson, Mark – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2005
This study presents a procedure for detecting differential item functioning (DIF) for dichotomous and polytomous items in testlet-based tests, whereby DIF is taken into account by adding DIF parameters into the Rasch testlet model. Simulations were conducted to assess recovery of the DIF and other parameters. Two independent variables, test type…
Descriptors: Test Format, Test Bias, Item Response Theory, Item Analysis
Wang, Wen-Chung; Su, Ya-Hui – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2004
Eight independent variables (differential item functioning [DIF] detection method, purification procedure, item response model, mean latent trait difference between groups, test length, DIF pattern, magnitude of DIF, and percentage of DIF items) were manipulated, and two dependent variables (Type I error and power) were assessed through…
Descriptors: Test Length, Test Bias, Simulation, Item Response Theory