Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Mathematical Models | 31 |
Probability | 10 |
Achievement Tests | 9 |
Test Items | 8 |
Comparative Analysis | 7 |
Multiple Choice Tests | 7 |
Test Reliability | 7 |
True Scores | 7 |
Cutting Scores | 6 |
Guessing (Tests) | 6 |
Mastery Tests | 6 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational and Psychological… | 6 |
Psychometrika | 6 |
Journal of Educational… | 4 |
Journal of Educational… | 3 |
Journal of Experimental… | 2 |
Review of Educational Research | 1 |
Author
Wilcox, Rand R. | 33 |
Harris, Chester W. | 1 |
Yeh, Jennie P. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 22 |
Journal Articles | 21 |
Reports - Evaluative | 12 |
Collected Works - General | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Wilcox, Rand R. – Psychometrika, 1989
Recent attempts have been made to find a robust method for comparing the variances of "J" dependent random variables. However, these procedures can give unsatisfactory results. Several new procedures that are derived heuristically are examined. The most effective method is based on the statistic derived by D. Quade. (TJH)
Descriptors: Heuristics, Mathematical Models, Psychometrics
Wilcox, Rand R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2006
Consider the nonparametric regression model Y = m(X)+ [tau](X)[epsilon], where X and [epsilon] are independent random variables, [epsilon] has a median of zero and variance [sigma][squared], [tau] is some unknown function used to model heteroscedasticity, and m(X) is an unknown function reflecting some conditional measure of location associated…
Descriptors: Nonparametric Statistics, Mathematical Models, Regression (Statistics), Probability

Wilcox, Rand R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
A formal framework is presented for determining which of the distractors of multiple-choice test items has a small probability of being chosen by a typical examinee. The framework is based on a procedure similar to an indifference zone formulation of a ranking and election problem. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Mathematical Models, Multiple Choice Tests, Probability, Test Items

Wilcox, Rand R. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1985
A new method of measuring item bias based on the latent class model proposed by the author is suggested. A test for item bias is also suggested that is based on standard asymptotic results. (Author/DWH)
Descriptors: Mathematical Models, Measurement Techniques, Statistical Analysis, Test Bias

Wilcox, Rand R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1982
A new model for measuring misinformation is suggested. A modification of Wilcox's strong true-score model, to be used in certain situations, is indicated, since it solves the problem of correcting for guessing without assuming guessing is random. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Guessing (Tests), Mathematical Models, Scoring Formulas

Wilcox, Rand R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
Results in the engineering literature on "k out of n system reliability" can be used to characterize tests based on estimates of the probability of correctly determining whether the examinee knows the correct response. In particular, the minimum number of distractors required for multiple-choice tests can be empirically determined.…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Mathematical Models, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Format

Wilcox, Rand R. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1981
Both the binomial and beta-binomial models are applied to various problems occurring in mental test theory. The paper reviews and critiques these models. The emphasis is on the extensions of the models that have been proposed in recent years, and that might not be familiar to many educators. (Author)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Item Analysis, Mathematical Models, Test Reliability

Wilcox, Rand R. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1989
Two methods of handling unequal variances in the two-way fixed effects analysis of variance (ANOVA) model are described. One is based on an improved Wilcox (1988) method for the one-way model, and the other is an extension of G. S. James' (1951) second order method. (TJH)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Equations (Mathematics), Estimation (Mathematics), Mathematical Models

Wilcox, Rand R. – Psychometrika, 1994
A generalization of the usual random-effects model based on trimmed means is proposed. The resulting test of no differences among J randomly sampled groups has advantages in terms of Type I errors and can yield gains in power when distributions have heavy tails and outliers. (SLD)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Equations (Mathematics), Models, Power (Statistics)

Wilcox, Rand R. – Review of Educational Research, 1995
Reviews new techniques for dealing with the problem that slight departures from normality can substantially lower power when means are compared and that a popular measure of effect size can be misleading. Contemporary ways of comparing groups can reveal important differences that are missed by conventional methods based on means. (SLD)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Effect Size, Measurement Techniques

Wilcox, Rand R. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1984
Two stage multiple-comparison procedures give an exact solution to problems of power and Type I errors, but require equal sample sizes in the first stage. This paper suggests a method of evaluating the experimentwise Type I error probability when the first stage has unequal sample sizes. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Mathematical Models, Power (Statistics), Probability

Wilcox, Rand R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
Technical problems in achievement testing associated with using latent structure models to estimate the probability of guessing correct responses by examinees is studied; also the lack of problems associated with using Wilcox's formula score. Maximum likelihood estimates are derived which may be applied when items are hierarchically related.…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Item Analysis, Mathematical Models, Maximum Likelihood Statistics

Wilcox, Rand R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
Wilcox has described three probability models which characterize a single test item in terms of a population of examinees (ED 156 718). This note indicates indicates that similar models can be derived which characterize a single examinee in terms of an item domain. A numerical illustration is given. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Item Analysis, Mathematical Models, Probability
Wilcox, Rand R. – 1979
In the past, several latent structure models have been proposed for handling problems associated with measuring the achievement of examinees. Typically, however, these models describe a specific examinee in terms of an item domain or they describe a few items in terms of a population of examinees. In this paper, a model is proposed which allows a…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Guessing (Tests), Mathematical Models, Multiple Choice Tests
Wilcox, Rand R. – 1980
Wilcox (1977) examines two methods of estimating the probability of a false-positive on false-negative decision with a mastery test. Both procedures make assumptions about the form of the true score distribution which might not give good results in all situations. In this paper, upper and lower bounds on the two possible error types are described…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Mastery Tests, Mathematical Models, Student Placement