Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 5 |
Item Response Theory | 4 |
Health Behavior | 3 |
Health Education | 3 |
Data Analysis | 2 |
Measurement Techniques | 2 |
Measures (Individuals) | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Behavior Change | 1 |
Behavior Modification | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Wilson, Mark | 5 |
Allen, Diane D. | 2 |
Allen, Diane | 1 |
Feuerstahler, Leah | 1 |
Li, Jun Corser | 1 |
Masse, Louise C. | 1 |
Williams, Geoffrey | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Feuerstahler, Leah; Wilson, Mark – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2019
Scores estimated from multidimensional item response theory (IRT) models are not necessarily comparable across dimensions. In this article, the concept of aligned dimensions is formalized in the context of Rasch models, and two methods are described--delta dimensional alignment (DDA) and logistic regression alignment (LRA)--to transform estimated…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Models, Scores, Comparative Analysis
Wilson, Mark; Allen, Diane D.; Li, Jun Corser – Health Education Research, 2006
This paper compares the approach and resultant outcomes of item response models (IRMs) and classical test theory (CTT). First, it reviews basic ideas of CTT, and compares them to the ideas about using IRMs introduced in an earlier paper. It then applies a comparison scheme based on the AERA/APA/NCME "Standards for Educational and…
Descriptors: Health Education, Self Efficacy, Health Behavior, Measures (Individuals)
Masse, Louise C.; Allen, Diane; Wilson, Mark; Williams, Geoffrey – Health Education Research, 2006
Standardizing the measurement tools that researchers use to assess the effectiveness of interventions would strengthen our ability to compare results across studies. In practice, however, standardization is difficult to implement, in part, because researchers prefer to use measurement tools that focus specifically on the components of their…
Descriptors: Health Education, Health Behavior, Measures (Individuals), Computation
Introducing Multidimensional Item Response Modeling in Health Behavior and Health Education Research
Allen, Diane D.; Wilson, Mark – Health Education Research, 2006
When measuring participant-reported attitudes and outcomes in the behavioral sciences, there are many instances when the common measurement assumption of unidimensionality does not hold. In these cases, the application of a multidimensional measurement model is both technically appropriate and potentially advantageous in substance. In this paper,…
Descriptors: Health Education, Health Behavior, Behavior Modification, Behavior Change

Wilson, Mark – Australian Journal of Education, 1989
Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) science superitems were examined from the perspectives of Guttman Scaling (deterministic) and Item Response Theory (probabilistic). Differences between the measurement bases for the two approaches, and the results for a small case study, are reported. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis, Data Analysis, Higher Education