Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Test Interpretation | 2 |
| Test Theory | 2 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| Health | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Measurement | 1 |
| Measurement Techniques | 1 |
| Misconceptions | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Hubley, Anita M. | 2 |
| Zumbo, Bruno D. | 2 |
| Pope, Gregory A. | 1 |
| Watson, Jackie E. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Eysenck Personality Inventory | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkHubley, Anita M.; Zumbo, Bruno D. – Social Indicators Research, 2011
The vast majority of measures have, at their core, a purpose of personal and social change. If test developers and users want measures to have personal and social consequences and impact, then it is critical to consider the consequences and side effects of measurement in the validation process itself. The consequential basis of test interpretation…
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Social Change, Measurement, Test Interpretation
Peer reviewedZumbo, Bruno D.; Pope, Gregory A.; Watson, Jackie E.; Hubley, Anita M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1997
E. Roskam's (1985) conjecture that steeper item characteristic curve (ICC) "a" parameters (slopes) (and higher item total correlations in classical test theory) would be found with more concretely worded test items was tested with results from 925 young adults on the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (H. Eysenck and S. Eysenck, 1975).…
Descriptors: Correlation, Personality Assessment, Personality Measures, Test Interpretation
