NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van der Linden, Wim J. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2010
The traditional way of equating the scores on a new test form X to those on an old form Y is equipercentile equating for a population of examinees. Because the population is likely to change between the two administrations, a popular approach is to equate for a "synthetic population." The authors of the articles in this issue of the…
Descriptors: Test Format, Equated Scores, Population Distribution, Population Trends
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van der Linden, Wim J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2006
Traditionally, error in equating observed scores on two versions of a test is defined as the difference between the transformations that equate the quantiles of their distributions in the sample and population of test takers. But it is argued that if the goal of equating is to adjust the scores of test takers on one version of the test to make…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Evaluation Criteria, Models, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van der Linden, Wim J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2006
Two local methods for observed-score equating are applied to the problem of equating an adaptive test to a linear test. In an empirical study, the methods were evaluated against a method based on the test characteristic function (TCF) of the linear test and traditional equipercentile equating applied to the ability estimates on the adaptive test…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Format, Equated Scores