Publication Date
In 2025 | 4 |
Descriptor
Comparative Testing | 4 |
Statistical Bias | 2 |
Test Validity | 2 |
Undergraduate Students | 2 |
Academic Standards | 1 |
Causal Models | 1 |
Context Effect | 1 |
Cultural Differences | 1 |
Cultural Influences | 1 |
Design | 1 |
Drafting | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Advances in Physiology… | 1 |
American Journal of Evaluation | 1 |
Journal of Civil Engineering… | 1 |
Structural Equation Modeling:… | 1 |
Author
A. R. Georgeson | 1 |
Andrew P. Jaciw | 1 |
Jeffrey P. Walters | 1 |
Jessica Kaminsky | 1 |
Kayt Frisch | 1 |
Ken Yasuhara | 1 |
Ole J. Kemi | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Bangladesh | 1 |
Mississippi | 1 |
Tennessee | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
A. R. Georgeson – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
There is increasing interest in using factor scores in structural equation models and there have been numerous methodological papers on the topic. Nevertheless, sum scores, which are computed from adding up item responses, continue to be ubiquitous in practice. It is therefore important to compare simulation results involving factor scores to…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Scores, Factor Analysis, Statistical Bias
Jeffrey P. Walters; Kayt Frisch; Ken Yasuhara; Jessica Kaminsky – Journal of Civil Engineering Education, 2025
Framing engineering problems in a humanitarian engineering (HE) context has been shown to have a significant impact on students' learning, particularly how they understand and articulate sociotechnical design considerations. However, no studies explicitly compared differences in sociotechnical thinking for different forms of engineering context.…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Engineering Education, Drafting, Social Values
Ole J. Kemi – Advances in Physiology Education, 2025
Students are assessed by coursework and/or exams, all of which are marked by assessors (markers). Student and marker performances are then subject to end-of-session board of examiner handling and analysis. This occurs annually and is the basis for evaluating students but also the wider learning and teaching efficiency of an academic institution.…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Criteria, Academic Standards
Andrew P. Jaciw – American Journal of Evaluation, 2025
By design, randomized experiments (XPs) rule out bias from confounded selection of participants into conditions. Quasi-experiments (QEs) are often considered second-best because they do not share this benefit. However, when results from XPs are used to generalize causal impacts, the benefit from unconfounded selection into conditions may be offset…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Elementary School Teachers, Generalization, Test Bias