Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
Descriptor
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Introductory Courses | 1 |
| Psychology | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| Scoring Rubrics | 1 |
| Technology Integration | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Teaching of Psychology | 1 |
Author
| Chelsea M. Sims | 1 |
| Chelsea R. Frazier | 1 |
| Elizabeth L. Wetzler | 1 |
| Kenneth S. Cassidy | 1 |
| Margaret J. Jones | 1 |
| Michael Wood | 1 |
| Nickalous A. Korbut | 1 |
| Shari S. Bowen | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkElizabeth L. Wetzler; Kenneth S. Cassidy; Margaret J. Jones; Chelsea R. Frazier; Nickalous A. Korbut; Chelsea M. Sims; Shari S. Bowen; Michael Wood – Teaching of Psychology, 2025
Background: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) represents a potentially powerful, time-saving tool for grading student essays. However, little is known about how AI-generated essay scores compare to human instructor scores. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the essay grading scores produced by AI with those of human…
Descriptors: Essays, Writing Evaluation, Scores, Evaluators
