Publication Date
In 2025 | 5 |
Descriptor
Cheating | 5 |
Identification | 5 |
Integrity | 3 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Plagiarism | 2 |
Student Evaluation | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Action Research | 1 |
Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
Authors | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Canadian Journal of Action… | 1 |
Contemporary Educational… | 1 |
Journal of Educators Online | 1 |
Mind, Brain, and Education | 1 |
Research Evaluation | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Information Analyses | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 4 |
Postsecondary Education | 4 |
Audience
Location
France | 1 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Pawel J. Matusz; Anna Abalkina; Dorothy V. M. Bishop – Mind, Brain, and Education, 2025
Fraudulent published papers were once thought to be rare, but in recent years, there has been growing awareness of coordinated activities by for-profit organizations that charge authors a fee to sell articles and submit them to reputable journals. These are known as paper mills. We reflect here on how "Mind, Brain and Education" suffered…
Descriptors: Plagiarism, Cheating, Deception, Writing for Publication
Olivier Leclerc – Research Evaluation, 2025
Detecting and punishing violations of research integrity requires first having to prove them. However, establishing proof of research misconduct presents a number of challenges. Firstly, it has to be conducted in a variety of contexts, including before research integrity officers, university disciplinary committees, civil courts, criminal courts,…
Descriptors: Cheating, Research, Identification, Integrity
Len Chan – Canadian Journal of Action Research, 2025
Anonymous marking, as a means to mitigate bias in grading, involves evaluating student work with their identities withheld. Anonymous marking is explored in this self-study to mitigate implicit bias, which negated a practitioner-researcher's educational values. The mixed methods action research findings show withholding student identities during…
Descriptors: Grading, Evaluation Methods, Student Evaluation, Bias
Marilyn U. Balagtas; Aurora B. Fulgencio; Joyce L. Bautista; Alvin B. Barcelona; Shiela Marie P. Jandusay; Ma. Danielle Renee Lim – Journal of Educators Online, 2025
The convenience and flexibility of online assessments can be beneficial in a variety of ways, but they can also pose risks and challenges, such as potential academic dishonesty by students. This study included 73 master's and doctoral students and investigated the relationship among their attitudes, experiences, and performance in an online…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Student Attitudes, Student Experience, Academic Achievement
Edmund De Leon Evangelista – Contemporary Educational Technology, 2025
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, particularly OpenAI's ChatGPT, has significantly impacted higher education institutions (HEIs), offering opportunities and challenges. While these tools enhance personalized learning and content generation, they threaten academic integrity, especially in assessment environments.…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Integrity, Educational Strategies, Natural Language Processing