NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ha Nguyen; Jake Hayward – Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2025
High-quality science assessments are multi-dimensional. They promote disciplinary practices, core ideas, cross-cutting concepts, and science sense-making. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), specifically multimodal large language models (MLLMs), to annotate and provide improvement…
Descriptors: Science Tests, Criticism, Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yizhu Gao; Xiaoming Zhai; Min Li; Gyeonggeon Lee; Xiaoxiao Liu – Grantee Submission, 2025
The rapid evolution of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming science education by facilitating innovative pedagogical paradigms while raising substantial concerns about scholarly integrity. One particularly pressing issue is the growing risk of student use of GenAI tools to outsource assessment tasks, potentially compromising…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Science Education, Integrity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Soojeong Jeong; Justin Rague; Kaylee Litson; David F. Feldon; M. Jeannette Lawler; Kenneth Plummer – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
DBL is a novel pedagogical approach intended to improve students' conditional knowledge and problem-solving skills by exposing them to a sequence of branching learning decisions. The DBL software provided students with ample opportunities to engage in the expert decision-making processes involved in complex problem-solving and to receive…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Learning Processes, Introductory Courses, Science Education
Louis Alexiz C. Urbina – Online Submission, 2025
This research investigated how collaborative e-learning strategies affected the understanding of DNA Replication among the 9th-grade Biology CC class. The study involved 24 diverse students (ages 15-17), including regular education students, English Language Learners (ELLs), and students with IEPs selected through proportional stratified random…
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Science Instruction, Teaching Methods, Outcomes of Education