Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Test Reliability | 3 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
| College Students | 2 |
| Moral Development | 2 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Behavior Patterns | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Competence | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Thoma, Stephen J. | 2 |
| Cesur, Sevim | 1 |
| Dawson, Kelsie J. | 1 |
| Glenn, Andrea L. | 1 |
| Han, Hyemin | 1 |
| Iran-Nejad, Asghar | 1 |
| Topcu, Mustafa Sami | 1 |
| Xu, Yuejin | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
| Turkey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Defining Issues Test | 3 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHan, Hyemin; Dawson, Kelsie J.; Thoma, Stephen J.; Glenn, Andrea L. – Journal of Experimental Education, 2020
We developed and tested a behavioral version of the Defining Issues Test-1 revised (DIT-1r), which is a measure of the development of moral judgment. We conducted a behavioral experiment using the behavioral Defining Issues Test (bDIT) to examine the relationship between participants' moral developmental status, moral competence, and reaction time…
Descriptors: Moral Values, Decision Making, Behavior Patterns, Test Construction
Download full textCesur, Sevim; Topcu, Mustafa Sami – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2010
The aim of the study is twofold: First and main aim was to develop a valid and reliable Turkish version of the DIT which is one of the most important instruments in the psychology and education research; second is to explore the relationships between moral development and age, gender, education, and parental education. The study group consists of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Tests, Moral Development, Age Differences
Xu, Yuejin; Iran-Nejad, Asghar; Thoma, Stephen J. – Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2007
The purpose of the study was to determine comparability of an online version to the original paper-pencil version of Defining Issues Test 2 (DIT2). This study employed methods from both Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT). Findings from CTT analyses supported the reliability and discriminant validity of both versions.…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Test Format, Comparative Analysis, Test Theory
