NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 14 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Flom, Jacalyn; Green, Karen; Wallace, Steven – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2023
Cheating in higher education has numerous negative implications, including degrading program reputations, inflating student retention rates, and cultivating poor ethical practices, all of which have implications for what students do in the workplace after graduation. Therefore, by understanding the current student population, Generation Z, it is…
Descriptors: Cheating, Ethics, Student Behavior, Age Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Knight, Stephanie K.; Greenberger, Scott W.; McNaughton, Morgan E. – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2021
Students need feedback from instructors to learn from their mistakes and improve their academic skills. Responding to student writing is a central and necessary component of the instructor-student feedback loop. There are many forms of feedback on written assignments, and not all of them have the same role in supporting student learning. For…
Descriptors: Interdisciplinary Approach, Feedback (Response), Written Language, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tim M. Benning – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2024
Reducing free-riding is an important challenge for educators who use group projects. In this study, we measure students' preferences for group project characteristics and investigate if characteristics that better help to reduce free-riding become more important for students when stakes increase. We used a discrete choice experiment based on 12…
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Activities, Student Participation, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dirkx, Kim; Joosten-ten Brinke, Desirée; Arts, Jorik; van Diggelen, Migchiel – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2021
Rubrics are often used as tools for criteria-based assessments. Although students indicate that they appreciate comments given as feedback which make reference to the rubric and provided in addition to it, there is little information on how this type of feedback actually differs from in-text comments with respect to focus, level, and function of…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Scoring Rubrics, Attention Control, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Law, Sweety; Baer, Amy – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2020
This article reports an initiative to improve student writing by incorporating technology-based structured peer review in the revision process. Although the most important step of writing, the revision step, is overlooked by students for several reasons. We describe a successful 10-week long intervention with students from upper-level…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Writing Evaluation, Peer Evaluation, Technology Uses in Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sharma, Amit; Van Hoof, Hubert B.; Ramsay, Crystal – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2019
The study reported here investigated reading among students from the perspective of how students choose to use their time and whether they self-ration it. A survey of undergraduate students found that their self-reported allocation of time to academic activities other than reading was positively correlated to the reading that they did and that…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Time Factors (Learning), Decision Making, Reading Habits
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Morris, Cecile; Chikwa, Gladson – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2016
Very little is known about the impact of the different types of feedback on students' academic performance. This article explores students' preference in the use of audio and written feedback and how each type of feedback received by students impacts their academic performance in subsequent assignments. The study involved 68 students who were…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Preferences, Academic Achievement, Assignments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Baker, Kimberly M. – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2016
Peer review is an established strategy for improving the quality of students' writing. This study moves beyond the focus on outcomes to assess the peer-review process. In particular, this study focuses on the timing of the peer review, a highly structured feedback form, and student writers' revisions after engaging in peer review. This study draws…
Descriptors: Writing Processes, Writing Improvement, Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lee, Sang Joon; Ngampornchai, Anchalee; Trail-Constant, Trudian; Abril, Andres; Srinivasan, Sandhya – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2016
Due to the realistic, complex natures of authentic cases involved in case-based learning, the use of group work has been encouraged and expected to enhance the quality of interaction among participants and to improve students' learning experiences. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the case-based online group work increased…
Descriptors: Case Method (Teaching Technique), Electronic Learning, Group Instruction, Cooperative Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Carmichael, Anna M.; Krueger, Lacy E. – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2014
The study examined potential factors and attitudes associated with providing fraudulent academic claims. A total of 319 students completed an online survey which involved reading a vignette about an incomplete assignment. Participants reported whether they would contact their instructor to gain an extension, expressed their confidence in the…
Descriptors: Online Surveys, Assignments, Vignettes, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Crossman, Joanne M.; Kite, Stacey L. – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2012
This study contributes to scant empirical investigation of peer critique of writing among heterogeneously grouped native and nonnative speakers of English, now commonplace in higher education. This mixed-methods study investigated the use of directed peer review to improve writing among graduate students, the majority of whom were nonnative…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Feedback (Response), Business Communication, Graduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Van Gaal, Frank; De Ridder, Annemieke – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2013
In this article, the impact of assessment tasks on examination result (measured by examination grades) is investigated. Although many describe the advantages of electronic assessment tasks, few studies have been undertaken which compare a traditional approach using a classical examination with a new approach using assessment tasks. The main…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Active Learning, Undergraduate Students, Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hunter, Kerry; Tse, Harry – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2013
Educators and researchers are increasingly calling for the processes of writing and knowledge construction to be an integral part of disciplinary learning. This article contributes to the literature by presenting an empirical analysis of a programme that was designed to expose students to the complexities of academic practices in conjunction with…
Descriptors: Content Area Writing, Grades (Scholastic), Program Effectiveness, Surveys
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leedham, Maria – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2009
The prose essay, case study and laboratory report, composed by individual students in isolation from their peers, used to be the mainstay of undergraduate writing. However, in recent years an array of alternative assignment types such as blogs, letters and e-posters have widened the repertoire of texts expected. This article attempts to describe…
Descriptors: Assignments, Web Sites, Electronic Publishing, Interviews