Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Credentials | 2 |
Cutting Scores | 2 |
Difficulty Level | 2 |
Standard Setting (Scoring) | 2 |
Test Items | 2 |
Certification | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
Evaluators | 1 |
Foreign Countries | 1 |
Generalizability Theory | 1 |
Group Discussion | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Applied Measurement in… | 2 |
Author
Chis, Liliana | 1 |
Clauser, Brian E. | 1 |
Harik, Polina | 1 |
Margolis, Melissa J. | 1 |
McManus, I. C. | 1 |
Mollon, Jennifer | 1 |
Williams, Simon | 1 |
Wyse, Adam E. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wyse, Adam E. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2018
This article discusses regression effects that are commonly observed in Angoff ratings where panelists tend to think that hard items are easier than they are and easy items are more difficult than they are in comparison to estimated item difficulties. Analyses of data from two credentialing exams illustrate these regression effects and the…
Descriptors: Regression (Statistics), Test Items, Difficulty Level, Licensing Examinations (Professions)
Clauser, Brian E.; Harik, Polina; Margolis, Melissa J.; McManus, I. C.; Mollon, Jennifer; Chis, Liliana; Williams, Simon – Applied Measurement in Education, 2009
Numerous studies have compared the Angoff standard-setting procedure to other standard-setting methods, but relatively few studies have evaluated the procedure based on internal criteria. This study uses a generalizability theory framework to evaluate the stability of the estimated cut score. To provide a measure of internal consistency, this…
Descriptors: Generalizability Theory, Group Discussion, Standard Setting (Scoring), Scoring