Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Error Patterns | 3 |
Misconceptions | 2 |
Arithmetic | 1 |
Cognitive Ability | 1 |
Cognitive Measurement | 1 |
Cognitive Tests | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
Data Analysis | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Error Correction | 1 |
Error of Measurement | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Psychology in the Schools | 3 |
Author
Alfonso, Vincent C. | 1 |
Black, Anne C. | 1 |
McCoach, D. Betsy | 1 |
Nelson, Gena | 1 |
O'Connell, Ann A. | 1 |
Powell, Sarah R. | 1 |
Ramos, Erica | 1 |
Schermerhorn, Susan M. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Powell, Sarah R.; Nelson, Gena – Psychology in the Schools, 2021
To understand misconceptions with rational numbers (i.e., fractions, decimals, and percentages), we administered an assessment of rational numbers to 331 undergraduate students from a 4-year university. The assessment included 41 items categorized as measuring foundational understanding, calculations, or word problems. We coded each student's…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Misconceptions, Number Concepts, Numbers
Ramos, Erica; Alfonso, Vincent C.; Schermerhorn, Susan M. – Psychology in the Schools, 2009
The interpretation of cognitive test scores often leads to decisions concerning the diagnosis, educational placement, and types of interventions used for children. Therefore, it is important that practitioners administer and score cognitive tests without error. This study assesses the frequency and types of examiner errors that occur during the…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Cognitive Tests, Scoring, Cognitive Ability
McCoach, D. Betsy; Black, Anne C.; O'Connell, Ann A. – Psychology in the Schools, 2007
Although structural equation modeling (SEM) is one of the most comprehensive and flexible approaches to data analysis currently available, it is nonetheless prone to researcher misuse and misconceptions. This article offers a brief overview of the unique capabilities of SEM and discusses common sources of user error in drawing conclusions from…
Descriptors: Misconceptions, Inferences, Data Analysis, Structural Equation Models